outcome_id string | label string | order int64 | definition string | detection_stage string | failure_class string | example_case_id string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
verified | Verified | 1 | The cited authority exists. The attributed proposition is supported by the source text at the claimed pin cite. The evidence bundle is complete and reproducible. | existence_and_support | null | null |
authority_not_found | Authority Not Found | 2 | The citation does not resolve to a published opinion, statute, or record in canonical registries. | existence | total_fabrication | 001 |
proposition_unsupported | Proposition Unsupported | 3 | The authority exists. The attributed holding or rule is not entailed by the source text. | support | semantic_drift | 004 |
source_trail_missing | Source Trail Missing | 4 | The output references an authority but the workflow preserved no primary source material, retrieval snapshot, or runtime state needed to verify what the model actually saw. | evidence_preservation | provenance_gap | null |
unverifiable | Unverifiable | 5 | Insufficient evidence was preserved at generation time to classify the citation at all. | evidence_preservation | provenance_gap | null |
Part of the Dali Open Evidence Ecosystem
Dali is the open verification layer for AI: it creates, scores, and preserves evidence so AI-assisted outputs can be independently verified, exchanged, and replayed. Legal AI is the proving ground.
Dali Verification Taxonomy
Five verification outcomes used by Dali to classify whether evidence behind an AI output can be trusted.
Applies beyond legal citations: any domain where AI outputs must be verified, exchanged, and preserved.
Evidence failures are not binary. Link checkers return valid or broken. Verification requires classification that separates what broke from why it broke.
Purpose
The Dali Verification Taxonomy provides a standardized language for classifying verification outcomes during AI-assisted legal review.
It enables consistent reporting, reproducible evaluation, and comparable verification results across tools and organizations.
Outcomes
| ID | Label | Detection stage |
|---|---|---|
| verified | Verified | existence_and_support |
| authority_not_found | Authority Not Found | existence |
| proposition_unsupported | Proposition Unsupported | support |
| source_trail_missing | Source Trail Missing | evidence_preservation |
| unverifiable | Unverifiable | evidence_preservation |
Files
outcomes.jsonl— one row per outcome for programmatic use (Dataset Viewer)meta/taxonomy.json— full taxonomy document
Engineering note
- Outcomes 2 and 3 require different detection pipelines
- Outcomes 4 and 5 are evidence preservation failures, not model failures
- Outcome 1 still requires a sealed bundle — correctness without provenance is not defensible
Intended Users
This project is designed for:
- Legal AI researchers
- AI evaluation platforms
- Law firms
- Legal technology companies
- Academic researchers
- Responsible AI practitioners
- Courts and public-interest organizations
- Open-source contributors
The Dali Open Evidence Ecosystem
Each project serves a different role while remaining independently useful.
| Resource | Purpose | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Dali Open Evidence Corpus | Preserve reproducible evidence artifacts | available |
| Dali Citation Benchmark (seed sample) | Hand-curated public sample for methodology review (5 cases, 14 authorities) | available |
| Dali Verification Taxonomy | Standardize verification outcomes | available |
| Full evaluation run | 524 citations · 3 models · 5 jurisdiction tracks — data/results/ | available |
| Dali Platform | Open-source verification engine | available (early-stage v0.x) |
| Dali Evaluation Prompts | Cross-jurisdiction evaluation resources | planned |
| Dali Replay Corpus | Replay traces and policy-version hashes | planned |
| Dali Evidence Artifacts | Portable evidence packages | planned |
| Research models (taxonomy, citation risk, authority matching, proposition support) | Lightweight research classifiers | planned |
GitHub
https://github.com/yenklabs/Dali
Website
How Everything Fits Together
AI-Assisted Work
│
â–¼
Seed Benchmark Sample / Full Evaluation Run
│
â–¼
Verification Taxonomy
│
â–¼
Open Evidence Corpus
│
â–¼
Evidence Ledger
│
â–¼
Evidence Infrastructure (Dali)
The seed sample is for methodology review.
The full evaluation run is the measured result set.
The taxonomy classifies.
The corpus preserves evidence.
Together they form Dali's open evidence infrastructure.
Current Project
- Open-source project (early-stage v0.x · current release v0.2.1)
- Public seed corpus and full evaluation run (named separately)
- Cross-jurisdiction support
- Open verification taxonomy
- Open evidence corpus
- CC BY 4.0 licensed datasets
Citation
If you use this dataset in research, benchmarking, or publications, please cite:
@dataset{dali_verification_taxonomy_v0_1,
title = {Dali Verification Taxonomy},
author = {{Dali Contributors}},
organization = {GammaLex AI Inc.},
year = {2026},
version = {0.1},
url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/yenklabs/dali-verification-taxonomy},
note = {Open taxonomy for classifying AI verification outcomes}
}
Dataset version 0.1 is the seed corpus release. The Dali engine release is v0.2.1 (github.com/yenklabs/Dali).
Version History
| Version | Description |
|---|---|
| v0.1 | Initial public seed release |
| v0.2 / v0.2.1 | Evaluation harness and documentation improvements (current) |
| Later v0.x | Continued early-stage releases — not a 1.0 claim |
Roadmap
Available
- ✓ Open Evidence Corpus (seed)
- ✓ Citation Benchmark seed sample (5 cases / 14 authorities)
- ✓ Full evaluation run (524 citations · data/results/)
- ✓ Verification Taxonomy
- ✓ Open-source verification platform (v0.2.1)
Planned
- Proposition verification
- Cross-jurisdiction expansion
- Community-contributed evidence
- Quarterly benchmark reports
- Evidence Ledger
- Evidence replay and reconstructability
- Dali Evaluation Prompts
- Dali Replay Corpus
- Dali Evidence Artifacts
- Research models (taxonomy classifier, citation risk, authority matching, proposition support)
Contributing
We welcome community contributions.
Areas where contributors can help include:
- Additional jurisdictions
- Verification methodologies
- Evidence artifacts
- Benchmark prompts
- Documentation improvements
- Dataset validation
- Research collaboration
GitHub
https://github.com/yenklabs/Dali
Design Principles
The Dali ecosystem is built around:
- Reproducibility
- Transparency
- Independent verification
- Evidence preservation
- Human accountability
- Cross-jurisdiction support
- Open collaboration
Why Dali Exists
AI-assisted work increasingly requires more than model outputs.
Organizations need to understand:
- What the AI generated.
- What evidence was reviewed.
- What could be independently verified.
- What could not be verified.
- What changed during review.
- What humans ultimately decided.
Dali is the open verification layer for AI: it creates, scores, and preserves evidence so AI-assisted outputs can be independently verified, exchanged, and replayed.
Related resources
- Essay: yenklabs.com/notes/dali-five-verification-outcomes
- Open evidence corpus: huggingface.co/datasets/yenklabs/open-evidence-corpus
- Benchmark: yenklabs/dali-citation-benchmark
- EPS draft: yenklabs.com/artifacts/evidence-package-spec-v0.1
- Ecosystem: huggingface.co/yenklabs
- Downloads last month
- 60