image imagewidth (px) 177 182 | filename stringclasses 10
values | ra float64 207 241 | dec float64 -1.42 44.4 | expert_consensus_anomaly bool 2
classes | expert_selected_count int64 2 14 | expert_total_count int64 16 16 | expert_selected_fraction float64 0.13 0.88 | zooniverse_subject_id int64 86.4M 86.4M | zooniverse_url stringclasses 10
values | volunteer_selected_fraction float64 0 0.84 | mantha_ml_anomaly_score float64 150 607 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
41192936846682523.png | 207.038733 | -1.131223 | true | 11 | 16 | 0.6875 | 86,398,000 | 0.5263 | 254.88937 | ||
41214781050350168.png | 214.682205 | -1.422818 | true | 10 | 16 | 0.625 | 86,398,075 | 0.5714 | 455.76273 | ||
41218771074969925.png | 216.595204 | -1.272066 | false | 2 | 16 | 0.125 | 86,398,158 | 0.2222 | 240.40372 | ||
69563914551059502.png | 217.767497 | 42.268995 | false | 2 | 16 | 0.125 | 86,398,160 | 0.2105 | 332.96216 | ||
70342656546334671.png | 214.185234 | 44.322087 | true | 11 | 16 | 0.6875 | 86,397,887 | 0.6 | 330.07498 | ||
70347028823040378.png | 216.160497 | 43.156495 | true | 14 | 16 | 0.875 | 86,398,339 | 0.8421 | 396.91077 | ||
70365200829662492.png | 223.10184 | 44.382452 | true | 13 | 16 | 0.8125 | 86,398,084 | 0.4091 | 607.0592 | ||
70381951202130938.png | 232.862448 | 43.762201 | false | 2 | 16 | 0.125 | 86,397,711 | 0.0833 | 204.12521 | ||
70391567633903843.png | 235.464195 | 43.517213 | false | 2 | 16 | 0.125 | 86,398,404 | 0.0833 | 149.83989 | ||
70405045241278791.png | 241.034611 | 43.846353 | false | 2 | 16 | 0.125 | 86,398,192 | 0 | 236.09576 |
HSC Anomaly Expert
This dataset contains 1,000 galaxy images independently scored by 16 expert
astronomers. The ten fixed few-shot examples form the train split; the
remaining 990 images form the test split used for evaluation, containing
45 expert-consensus anomalies and 945 other images.
The images come from public data release 2 of the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam
(HSC) survey; this is the HSC in the dataset name. The source images,
Zooniverse subject metadata, volunteer measurements, and
mantha_ml_anomaly_score come from Mantha et al. (2024),
Through the citizen scientists' eyes: Insights into using citizen science
with machine learning for effective identification of unknown-unknowns in
big data, Citizen Science: Theory and
Practice, 9(1), Article 40, 1–15. Please cite Mantha et al. when using
this dataset.
expert_consensus_anomaly is true when at least 40% of the 16 experts
selected an image. The accompanying count, total, and fraction columns are
aggregate survey measurements; individual expert identities and votes are
not included. volunteer_selected_fraction is the source table's
percent_selected divided by 100, and mantha_ml_anomaly_score is its
anomaly_score.
Images were downloaded from the Zooniverse URLs recorded by Mantha et al. and stored byte-for-byte as their original PNGs, without resizing or re-encoding. Metadata were joined by the numeric image filename, and rows retain the filename-sorted order used to construct the evaluation set.
- Downloads last month
- 20