my opinion about nsfw

#35
by Arun63 - opened

i tested in my gpu A100 80.model looking too good.

good face consistency.
less censorship.
understand the body structure perfectly.
prompt following is too good.

skin texture,slaping,lip lock,french kiss are damn good.

good quality even 0.2 pixel.

but very slow.need lighting lora.but i afraid of lighting lora will spoil the model.

overall opinion. perfect model for nsfw video. thank you guys.

update.
i notice bluring in teeth for all resolution.i dont know why.
controling body part via prompt is very good.
please use offcial prompt structure.its really work well.

Arun63 changed discussion title from my opinion to my opinion about nsfw

before light lora its minimax h3 after lighting lora it became ltx

The male genitals were coming out looking really weirdβ€”is there a way to fix that? I'm curious about how to write the prompt.

The male genitals were coming out looking really weirdβ€”is there a way to fix that? I'm curious about how to write the prompt.

lora is the only option

A100 80 gpu ram with sage attention. 0.5 pixel,10s,20 steps

[INFO] Model MiniMaxH3 prepared for dynamic VRAM loading. 32427MB Staged. 0 patches attached. Force pre-loaded 210 weights: 1142 KB.
95%|β–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–Œ| 19/20 [03:40<00:16, 16.62s/it]

wan 2.2 7/10 ,
ltx 2.3 5/10,
min max h3 8/10

i dont know why blur coming.

wtf hugging face is wild

Sign up or log in to comment