EDEN-AlexNet-Custom-ImageNet300 — Baseline
Primary KPI: EAG (Energy-to-Accuracy Gradient) =
-9.1826e-11ΔAcc/ΔJoules
Abstract
This model is part of Project EDEN (Energy-Driven Evolution of Networks), implementing the E2AM (Energy Efficient Advanced Model) Framework. The goal is to shift AI benchmarking from pure accuracy to Green SOTA — maximising predictive power per Joule consumed.
Applied Technique: Baseline – Standard Full Training (Reference Study)
Profiling Environment
| Component | Specification |
|---|---|
| GPU | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti (11 GB VRAM, 250 W TDP) |
| CPU | Intel Xeon W-2125 (4 cores / 8 threads @ 4.00 GHz) |
| RAM | 63.66 GB System RAM |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| Dataset | Custom-ImageNet300 — ~450,000 images – 300 classes (224 px) |
🟢 Green Delta Table
Comparing this model against the reference baseline (ResNet-50 equivalent)
| Metric | ResNet50 Baseline | AlexNet (EDEN) | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accuracy | 0.9573 | 0.9861 | +2.88% |
| Total Energy (J) | 380,392,115 | 66,625,795 | 82.48% saved |
| CO₂ Emissions (kg) | 50.1906 | 8.7909 | — |
| EAG Score | — | -9.1826e-11 | ΔAcc/ΔJoules |
A positive EAG means this model learns more per Joule than the baseline. A negative EAG indicates a trade-off where higher accuracy required more energy investment.
E2AM Algorithm — Applied Phases
Standard full fine-tuning used as the Brute-Force Baseline for energy comparison. All layers trained from epoch 1 with a fixed learning rate and no gradient accumulation. Included for transparent EAG benchmarking.
Training Statistics
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Final Accuracy | 0.9861 (98.61%) |
| Total Energy Consumed | 66,625,795 J (18.5072 kWh) |
| Training Time | 4,081 s (1.13 hrs) |
| Estimated CO₂ | 8.7909 kg CO₂e |
| Training Log | test2\alexnet_CustomImageNet300_stats.csv |
📊 Training Visualizations
Accuracy & Energy over Training
Green = accuracy (left axis) · Orange dashed = cumulative energy (right axis)
EAG Metric Trajectory
EAG = ΔAccuracy / ΔJoules — positive means learning more per Joule than baseline
Project-Wide Overview
All EDEN models: energy vs accuracy
Cite This Research
@misc{eden2025,
title = {Project EDEN: Energy-Driven Evolution of Networks},
author = {EDEN Research Team},
year = {2025},
note = {Hugging Face: Shanmuk4622},
url = {https://huggingface.co/Shanmuk4622}
}
Evaluation results
- Accuracy on Custom-ImageNet300self-reported0.986
- F1 Score on Custom-ImageNet300self-reported0.986


