--- pretty_name: EdgeBench Build Kits --- # EdgeBench Build Kits Self-contained, auditable build kits for rebuilding the **EdgeBench** task environment images from scratch on your own infrastructure — no access to any private registry or network required. Every released EdgeBench task image is exactly: **a public base image + a set of filesystem layers on top**. A kit ships that upper-layer content in an inspectable form, so a rebuild covers the same audit surface as a from-scratch build, while you audit the exact shipped bits rather than a build recipe that could drift from them. ## Repository layout ``` bases//Dockerfile # reference recipes for the language base images # (generated from EdgeBench tasks/BENCHMARK.yaml) kits//work/ # one kit per released image kits//judge/ Dockerfile # FROM [+ RUN rm] + ADD context.tar + config replay context.tar # merged filesystem diff above the base (ownership/modes preserved) MANIFEST.sha256 # per-file sha256 + mode + uid:gid + size — the audit anchor kit.json # provenance: source/base image IDs, layer digests, final image name build_from_kit.py # standalone builder/verifier (python3 stdlib + docker CLI only) ``` Notes on the format: - `context.tar` is the **merged final view** of the task layers: files added and later deleted by intermediate layers are collapsed away and never ship. - Layer whiteouts are materialized as `RUN rm` **only** when they delete files that exist in the base image; the pilot kits are purely additive (no `RUN rm`). - `ADD context.tar /` preserves every file's owner, mode, and symlinks exactly as recorded in the released image's layers. ## Quick start (with the SForge harness) Base images build from public official images (`ubuntu:22.04`, `python:3.11`, `maven:3.9-eclipse-temurin-17`, ...). Base tags are deterministic — they hash the base definition in `tasks/BENCHMARK.yaml` — so a base you build yourself gets exactly the name each kit's `FROM` line expects. ```bash # builds the base automatically, then work + judge from the kits, # then re-verifies every file against MANIFEST.sha256 python -m sforge build --task ad_placement_optimization --kits-dir kits/ --verify python -m sforge run --task ad_placement_optimization --agent ... ``` ## Quick start (standalone, no harness) ```bash # base (tag must match the kit Dockerfile's FROM line, see bases/) docker build -t edgebench.base.cpp:19685ea8d3f4 bases/cpp/ # task images — the kit directory is the docker build context; # tag with kit.json's "final_name" docker build -t edgebench.work.ad_placement_optimization:49747cad3ebd \ kits/ad_placement_optimization/work docker build -t edgebench.judge.ad_placement_optimization:56cbfc81cfa1 \ kits/ad_placement_optimization/judge # optional: file-by-file verification against the manifest python3 build_from_kit.py --kit kits/ad_placement_optimization/work --verify ``` ## Verifying the kits themselves Each `kit.json` records the source image ID the kit was derived from. To cross-check independently: pull the corresponding published EdgeBench image, compute its filesystem diff over the published base, and compare with `MANIFEST.sha256` — the manifests are reproducible byte-for-byte. ## Current coverage Pilot batch (3 tasks / 6 kits): `ad_placement_optimization` (cpp), `k12_math_recommendation` (python), `exchange_core_throughput` (java). Remaining tasks will be added incrementally.