Prompt:
FYI
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 07/13/2000
08:40 PM ---------------------------

Daniel Reck
07/10/2000 06:03 PM
To: David W Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: Dow Jones Gas vs. Coal feature

FYI

=DJ Pricey Natural Gas May Alter New US Power Plant Options

  HOUSTON (Dow Jones)--High natural gas prices could slow the stampede to
build
as much as 140,000 megawatts of new electric generation across the U.S. and
give
new coal technology the boost it needs to compete economically with gas in
the
future.
  While market observers say the recent level of the price of natural gas -
above $4.00 per million British thermal unit since late May - may not be
sustainable, many expect gas to remain above $3.00/MMBtu for the foreseeable
future.
  The jump in gas prices is blamed on a number of factors, from increased
demand
to fuel new power plants to stagnant U.S. gas production and a lack of
available
gas reserves in storage.
  Pricier gas could create a variety of effects on future electric
generation:
from damping interest in building some new gas-fired plants to improving
economic prospects for investment to upgrade or build new coal-fired plants.

  Current gas prices are off the chart when compared to existing forecasts
from
the Energy Information Institute, part of the U.S. Department of Energy. EIA
projects the average U.S. wellhead price of gas will only rise to
$2.81/MMBtu by
2020, up from an average of $1.96/MMBtu in 1998, a jump of 43%. EIA predicts
coal prices will fall by 28% during the same period.
  Continued high natural gas prices may mean some proposed combined-cycle
gas
plants are never built, predicts a Midwest utility coal buyer. "It's awfully
hard for a combined-cycle gas plant to compete with coal. No way they can do
it
at these prices."
  However, a recent report from Raymond James and Associates Inc., concluded
that gas-fired generation will still be economical this summer even if gas
prices climb above $7.00/MMBtu because of high power prices in most regional
US
wholesale markets.

  Future Gas Supply Questioned; Coal Won't 'Go Away'

  "The gas turbine generation trend is not over, not by a long shot," said
the
Raymond James report. "Gas turbines use gas more efficiently than the
nation's
fleet of older, conventional boiler-driven generators that are fired by gas.
The
efficiency gains enabled by gas turbine generation will be more valuable as
gas
prices rise."
  While gas-fired plants are much cheaper and quicker to build than
traditional
coal-fired plants, many industry observers doubt that U.S. gas supply can
grow
to meet future demand, expected to reach 30 trillion cubic feet or more per
year
by 2020.
  "Coal will not go away," said Steve Bergstrom, president of Dynegy Inc.
(DYN).
"The coal industry will figure it out. There are too many jobs involved and
it's
too cheap."
  Bergstrom expects the rapidly expanding appetite for electricity across
the
U.S., which is growing 3% per year, will require additional generation from
many
fuel sources.
  "You'll see gas will be used in most of the additional generation for the
next
four to five years," he predicted. "In the latter half of the decade, you'll
see
other alternatives, like coal, come into play. Technology will create
changes."
  Even some independent power producers who are rushing to build gas-fired
power
plants in the U.S. admit the recent price of gas, if prolonged, is a threat.

  Bob Kelly, Calpine Corp.'s (CPN) senior vice president, said his firm's
fleet
of 40,000 MW of highly efficient natural gas plants to be in place by 2004
will
be profitable even with gas at $4.00/MMBtu, but he expects owners of
coal-fired
plants to make additional capital investment to keep those plants running as
well.
  "If gas stays $4.00 forever, you'll see more coal plants. It will make
sense
to put scrubbers on," said Kelly.

  Southern Co. Evaluating Coal-to-Gas Technology

  Gas has to compete on price with other available fuel, agreed Bob Carter,
chairman of Panda Energy International. Carter told Dow Jones Newswires late
last month that the idea of new coal-fired generation is "very possible."
  In fact, the jump in gas prices has given a boost to Southern Co.'s (SO)
effort to build a first-of-its-kind coal plant that seeks to be cost and
environmentally competitive with natural gas, said Charles H. Goodman,
Southern
Co.'s vice president for research and environmental affairs.
  Southern, with major DOE funding, recently announced a major advance in
its
effort to utilize coal in a more efficient and less polluting fashion to
generate electricity.
  The new process combines use of a "transport reactor," a device based on
existing technology used to "crack" crude oil into lighter products, to turn
coal into a gas which is then burned in a combustion turbine much like
natural
gas.
  In its gaseous form, coal can be cleaned of many of its pollutant-forming
impurities such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides and particulate matter,
Goodman said.
  The key to the technology is the ability to burn the coal gas in a highly
efficient gas turbine rather than burning it to make steam to turn a
turbine, he
added.
  The new technology can produce 100 megawatts of power with two-thirds less
coal than a traditional boiler-type coal generator, said Goodman.
  And higher natural gas prices could move this technology closer to a
reality.
  "The urgency of getting on with this (coal technology) is the forecast for
gas
prices," said Goodman. "At $2.50/MMBtu, it's a bigger stretch for this coal
plant (to compete with gas) than at $3.00 or $3.50/MMBtu."

  New Coal Technology May Also Address Emissions

  Goodman said Southern hopes to make a decision in the second half of 2001
on
whether to build a commercial power plant with the coal gasification
technology
now being tested at Southern's Power Systems Development Facility in
Wilsonville, Ala.
  If gas prices stay high or remain volatile, Goodman said that will
influence
the timing, size and other variables associated with building the first
full-size plant to burn coal gas in this manner.
  "The $64 question is the price of gas," said Goodman. If gas is cheap and
plentiful, utilities will have a harder time investing in coal technology,
he
said.
  But because the U.S. has abundant coal resources, Goodman predicts the
coal-to-gas technology could eventually be used not only for new plants but
to
repower existing coal plants in a way that addresses air quality concern.
  Other partners in the Power Systems Development Facility include the
Electric
Power Research Institute, Foster Wheeler Corp. (FWC), Halliburton's Kellogg
Brown & Root (HAL), Peabody Group, Combustion Power Corp. and
Siemens-Westinghouse Power.

  -By Eileen O'Grady, Dow Jones Newswires; 713-547-9213;


Prompt:
Ike, it is unfortunate we could not make this work yesterday; but I
understand your position.  In the interest of facilitating continuing
dialogue and perhaps giving you our view on how we analyze such positions, I
will send you our document.  I would suggest that we try to set up a follow
up meeting in early October once you have completed your work.

Regards
Dave Delainey
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 09/28/2000
08:44 AM ---------------------------

"Zeringue,Oswald J" <


Prompt:
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001
08:59 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sherri Sera @ ENRON                           02/09/2001 08:38 AM

To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: URG: Gas Securitization Agreements

FYI - SRS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 02/09/2001
08:39 AM ---------------------------

"Jauregui, Robert M" <RMJ4@pge.com> on 02/08/2001 07:55:44 PM
To: "'taylorja2@bp.com'" <taylorja2@bp.com>, "'mcclankg@bp.com'"
<mcclankg@bp.com>, "'sdba@dynegy.com'" <sdba@dynegy.com>, "'


Prompt:
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001
08:59 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sherri Sera @ ENRON                           02/09/2001 08:38 AM

To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: URG: Gas Securitization Agreements

FYI - SRS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 02/09/2001
08:39 AM ---------------------------

"Jauregui, Robert M" <RMJ4@pge.com> on 02/08/2001 07:55:44 PM
To: "'taylorja2@bp.com'" <taylorja2@bp.com>, "'mcclankg@bp.com'"
<mcclankg@bp.com>, "'sdba@dynegy.com'" <sdba@dynegy.com>, "'njwa@dynegy.com'"
<njwa@dynegy.com>, "'pete.j.pavluk@dynegy.com'"  <pete.j.pavluk@dynegy.com>,
"'chuck.watson@dynegy.com'"  <chuck.watson@dynegy.com>,
"'pwarden@pillsburywinthrop.com'"  <pwarden@pillsburywinthrop.com>,
"'repling@pillsburywinthrop.com'"  <repling@pillsburywinthrop.com>,
"'mmce@dynegy.com'" <mmce@dynegy.com>, "'swbe@dynegy.com'" <swbe@dynegy.com>,
"'bcli@dynegy.com'"  <bcli@dynegy.com>, "'singleton.greg@epenergy.com'"
<singleton.greg@epenergy.com>, "'hoferc@epenergy.com'"
<hoferc@epenergy.com>, "'smithc@epenergy.com'" <smithc@epenergy.com>,
"'WiseW@epenergy.com'" <WiseW@epenergy.com>, "'jonesg@epenergy.com'"
<jonesg@epenergy.com>, "'colliw@texaco.com'" <colliw@texaco.com>,
"'benewm@texaco.com'" <benewm@texaco.com>, "'underga@texaco.com'"
<underga@texaco.com>, "'hans@cook-inlet.com'" <hans@cook-inlet.com>,
"'prez@cook-inlet.com'" <prez@cook-inlet.com>, "'davidyi@cook-inlet.com'"
<davidyi@cook-inlet.com>, "'dronn@mayerbrown.com'"  <dronn@mayerbrown.com>,
"'swidner@coral-energy.com'"  <swidner@coral-energy.com>,
"'blong@coral-energy.com'"  <blong@coral-energy.com>,
"'ctise@coral-energy.com'"  <ctise@coral-energy.com>,
"'jeff.skilling@enron.com'"  <jeff.skilling@enron.com>,
"'william.s.bradford@enron.com'"  <william.s.bradford@enron.com>,
"'travis.mccullough@enron.com'"  <travis.mccullough@enron.com>,
"'ICCEnergy@aol.com'" <ICCEnergy@aol.com>, "'stefkatz@cs.com'"
<stefkatz@cs.com>, "'msessa@sempratrading.com'"  <msessa@sempratrading.com>,
"'dfelsinger@sempra.com'"  <dfelsinger@sempra.com>, "'mcosta@stroock.com'"
<mcosta@stroock.com>, "'jshorter@txuenergy.com'" <jshorter@txuenergy.com>,
"'mperkins2@txuelectric.com'" <mperkins2@txuelectric.com>,
"'cenochs@txuenergy.com'" <cenochs@txuenergy.com>,
"'bjeffrie@westerngas.com'" <bjeffrie@westerngas.com>,
"'ryanmcgeachie@aec.ca'" <ryanmcgeachie@aec.ca>, "'richarddaniel@aec.ca'"
<richarddaniel@aec.ca>, "'jones.murphy@williams.com'"
<jones.murphy@williams.com>, "'randall.o'neal@williams.com'"
<randall.o'neal@williams.com>, "'kelly.knowlton@williams.com'"
<kelly.knowlton@williams.com>, "'connie.turner@williams.com'"
<connie.turner@williams.com>, "'scampbell@txuenergy.com'"
<scampbell@txuenergy.com>, "'ilydiatt@altra.com'" <ilydiatt@altra.com>,
"'


Prompt:
---------------------- Forwarded by David W Delainey/HOU/ECT on 02/09/2001
08:59 AM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Sherri Sera @ ENRON                           02/09/2001 08:38 AM

To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, John J Lavorato/Corp/Enron, David W
Delainey/HOU/ECT@ECT, Louise Kitchen/HOU/ECT@ECT
cc:
Subject: URG: Gas Securitization Agreements

FYI - SRS
---------------------- Forwarded by Sherri Sera/Corp/Enron on 02/09/2001
08:39 AM ---------------------------

"Jauregui, Robert M" <RMJ4@pge.com> on 02/08/2001 07:55:44 PM
To: "'taylorja2@bp.com'" <taylorja2@bp.com>, "'mcclankg@bp.com'"
<mcclankg@bp.com>, "'sdba@dynegy.com'" <sdba@dynegy.com>, "'njwa@dynegy.com'"
<njwa@dynegy.com>, "'pete.j.pavluk@dynegy.com'"  <pete.j.pavluk@dynegy.com>,
"'chuck.watson@dynegy.com'"  <chuck.watson@dynegy.com>,
"'pwarden@pillsburywinthrop.com'"  <pwarden@pillsburywinthrop.com>,
"'repling@pillsburywinthrop.com'"  <repling@pillsburywinthrop.com>,
"'mmce@dynegy.com'" <mmce@dynegy.com>, "'swbe@dynegy.com'" <swbe@dynegy.com>,
"'bcli@dynegy.com'"  <bcli@dynegy.com>, "'singleton.greg@epenergy.com'"
<singleton.greg@epenergy.com>, "'hoferc@epenergy.com'"
<hoferc@epenergy.com>, "'smithc@epenergy.com'" <smithc@epenergy.com>,
"'WiseW@epenergy.com'" <WiseW@epenergy.com>, "'jonesg@epenergy.com'"
<jonesg@epenergy.com>, "'colliw@texaco.com'" <colliw@texaco.com>,
"'benewm@texaco.com'" <benewm@texaco.com>, "'underga@texaco.com'"
<underga@texaco.com>, "'hans@cook-inlet.com'" <hans@cook-inlet.com>,
"'prez@cook-inlet.com'" <prez@cook-inlet.com>, "'davidyi@cook-inlet.com'"
<davidyi@cook-inlet.com>, "'dronn@mayerbrown.com'"  <dronn@mayerbrown.com>,
"'swidner@coral-energy.com'"  <swidner@coral-energy.com>,
"'blong@coral-energy.com'"  <blong@coral-energy.com>,
"'ctise@coral-energy.com'"  <ctise@coral-energy.com>,
"'jeff.skilling@enron.com'"  <jeff.skilling@enron.com>,
"'william.s.bradford@enron.com'"  <william.s.bradford@enron.com>,
"'travis.mccullough@enron.com'"  <travis.mccullough@enron.com>,
"'ICCEnergy@aol.com'" <ICCEnergy@aol.com>, "'stefkatz@cs.com'"
<stefkatz@cs.com>, "'msessa@sempratrading.com'"  <msessa@sempratrading.com>,
"'dfelsinger@sempra.com'"  <dfelsinger@sempra.com>, "'mcosta@stroock.com'"
<mcosta@stroock.com>, "'jshorter@txuenergy.com'" <jshorter@txuenergy.com>,
"'mperkins2@txuelectric.com'" <mperkins2@txuelectric.com>,
"'cenochs@txuenergy.com'" <cenochs@txuenergy.com>,
"'bjeffrie@westerngas.com'" <bjeffrie@westerngas.com>,
"'ryanmcgeachie@aec.ca'" <ryanmcgeachie@aec.ca>, "'richarddaniel@aec.ca'"
<richarddaniel@aec.ca>, "'jones.murphy@williams.com'"
<jones.murphy@williams.com>, "'randall.o'neal@williams.com'"
<randall.o'neal@williams.com>, "'kelly.knowlton@williams.com'"
<kelly.knowlton@williams.com>, "'connie.turner@williams.com'"
<connie.turner@williams.com>, "'scampbell@txuenergy.com'"
<scampbell@txuenergy.com>, "'ilydiatt@altra.com'" <ilydiatt@altra.com>,
"'dkohler@br-inc.com'" <dkohler@br-inc.com>, "'Reason@br-inc.com'"
<Reason@br-inc.com>, "'sallen@duke-energy.com'" <sallen@duke-energy.com>,
"'rsbaker@duke-energy.com'" <rsbaker@duke-energy.com>,
"'richard.ruzika@gs.com'" <richard.ruzika@gs.com>,
"'steve.brown@southernenergy.com'" <steve.brown@southernenergy.com>,
"'kenny.foo@ngx.com'" <kenny.foo@ngx.com>, "'tgary@pcenergy.com'"
<tgary@pcenergy.com>, "'bredd@pcenergy.com'" <bredd@pcenergy.com>,
"'harry_wijsman@pcp.ca'" <harry_wijsman@pcp.ca>, "'celias@pcenergy.com'"
<celias@pcenergy.com>, "'Hal-Borlan@reliantenergy.Com'"
<Hal-Borlan@reliantenergy.Com>, "'priscilla-massey@reliantenergy.com'"
<priscilla-massey@reliantenergy.Com>, "'llittle@reliantenergy.com'"
<llittle@reliantenergy.Com>, "'gary-lamb@transcanada.com'"
<gary-lamb@transcanada.com>, "'larry-desmeules@coastenergy.com'"
<larry-desmeules@coastenergy.com>, "'five5wood@aol.com'"
<five5wood@aol.com>, "'don.fishbeck@cmenergy.com'"
<don.fishbeck@cmenergy.com>, "'randy.harrison@southernenergy.com'"
<randy.harrison@southernenergy.com>, "'john.krill@engageenergy.com'"
<john.krill@engageenergy.com>, "'glen.mackey@energy.com'"
<glen.mackey@energy.com>, "'doug.rabey@energy.com'"  <doug.rabey@energy.com>,
"'


Prompt:
Chris,

What month and date is this effective?

sg
---------------------- Forwarded by Steve Gillespie/Corp/Enron on 11/09/2000
12:13 PM ---------------------------

Chris Germany@ECT
11/08/2000 03:10 PM
To:


Prompt:
I hope I was not being intrusive, but I usually pray on my way into work and
I thought of you and Ingrid and felt compelled to tell you my thoughts.  I
wish you the best in fatherhood and marriage!!  they are beautiful and much
more rewarding than any job will ever be!

Keep in touch.

Eric

>From: "Germany, Chris" <Chris.Germany@ENRON.com>
>To: <


Prompt:
CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS
DOMESTIC U.S.
Wednesday, June 6, 2001
****************************************

YOU'RE TAKING THE FLIGHTS, SO EARN THE MILES

Don't miss out on any more miles. Become a OnePass member
and start earning miles towards free travel every time you fly.
Register instantly for your OnePass number at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760BmM20Ow0nZk0Ap

****************************************
TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS
1. CO.O.L. Travel Specials Offers
2. Featured Fares Sample Destinations
3. Alamo Rent A Car Offers
4. National Car Rental Offers
5. Westin Hotels & Resorts, Sheraton Hotels & Resorts,
   Four Points by Sheraton, St. Regis, The Luxury Collection and W Hotels
6. Hilton Hotel Offers

****************************************
This week's specials are good for the following markets departing Saturday,
June 9 and returning on either Monday, June 11 or Tuesday, June 12, 2001.
Please see the Terms and Conditions listed at the end of this e-mail.

****************************************
1. CO.O.L. Travel Specials Offers

Purchase CO.O.L. Travel Specials online until 11:59pm (CST) Friday at
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760BmM20Ow0nZl0Aq
You can also purchase CO.O.L. Travel Specials for an additional cost of $20
per ticket through our telephone service at 1-800-642-1617.

********************************
TRAVEL MAY ORIGINATE IN EITHER CITY
********************************
****Roundtrip BETWEEN CLEVELAND, OH and:

$139 - Albany, NY
$159 - Buffalo, NY
$159 - Dayton, OH
$159 - Grand Rapids, MI
$149 - Hartford, CT
$119 - Indianapolis, IN
$129 - Milwaukee, WI
$99  - Nashville, TN

****Roundtrip BETWEEN HOUSTON, TX and:
$139 - Abilene, TX
$109 - Baton Rouge, LA
$149 - Boston, MA
$89  - Corpus Christi, TX
$179 - El Paso, TX
$99  - New Orleans, LA
$229 - Tucson, AZ

****Roundtrip BETWEEN NEW YORK/NEWARK and:

$309 - Austin, TX
$169 - Columbia, SC
$179 - Nashville, TN
$129 - New Orleans, LA
$309 - Orange County/Santa Ana, CA
$129 - Raleigh Durham, NC
$149 - Richmond, VA

********************************
2. FEATURED FARES SAMPLE DESTINATION

Choose your fare, find your flight. Or, quickly sift through all our great
featured fares by choosing a destination or origin. Be spontaneous. Get out
of town. Current Featured Fares destinations include:

New York, Baltimore, Buffalo, Houston,
Cleveland, Phoenix, and many more.

Note: Featured Fares change often. To see a regularly-updated online list
and purchase our Featured Fares, visit the website at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760BmM20Ow0nZm0Ar

(Capacity controls and other restrictions apply)

********************************
3. CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS FROM ALAMO RENT A CAR

Rates listed below are valid on compact class vehicles at airport locations
only. Other car types may be available.  Rates are valid for rentals on
Saturday, June 9, 2001 with returns Monday, June 11, 2001 or Tuesday, June 12,
2001.
-------------------------------
$20 a day in:  Austin, TX (AUS)
$26 a day in:  Hartford, CT (BDL)
$18 a day in:  Nashville, TN (BNA)
$26 a day in:  Boston, MA (BOS)
$27 a day in:  Buffalo, NY (BUF)
$20 a day in:  Cleveland, OH (CLE)
$46 a day in:  Newark, NJ (EWR)
$18 a day in:  Houston, TX (IAH)
$20 a day in:  Indianapolis, IN (IND)
$18 a day in:  Milwaukee, WI (MKE)
$26 a day in:  New Orleans, LA (MSY)
$18 a day in:  Raleigh-Durham, NC (RDU)
$20 a day in:  Orange County, CA (SNA)
$26 a day in:  Tucson, AZ (TUS)

To receive special Continental CO.O.L. discounted rates, simply make advance
reservations and be sure to request ID # 596871 and Rate Code 33. Book your
reservation online at:

http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760BmM20Ow0bf10Ar
or contact Alamo at 1-800 GO ALAMO.

*If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed, Alamo
offers great rates when you book online at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760BmM20Ow0bf20As

For complete details on these offers, please refer to Alamo's terms and
conditions below.

****************************************
4. CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS FROM NATIONAL CAR RENTAL

Rates listed below are valid on intermediate class vehicles at airport locations
only. Other car types may be available.  Rates are valid for rentals on
Saturday, June 9, 2001 with returns Monday, June 11, 2001 or Tuesday, June 12,
2001.
------------------------------------------
$23 a day in:  Austin, TX (AUS)
$29 a day in:  Hartford, CT (BDL)
$21 a day in:  Nashville, TN (BNA)
$29 a day in:  Boston, MA (BOS)
$30 a day in:  Baton Rouge, LA (BTR)
$27 a day in:  Buffalo, NY (BUF)
$21 a day in:  Columbia, SC (CAE)
$23 a day in:  Cleveland, OH (CLE)
$21 a day in:  Dayton, OH (DAY)
$19 a day in:  El Paso, TX (ELP)
$32 a day in:  Newark, NJ (EWR)
$23 a day in:  Grand Rapids, MI (GRR)
$21 a day in:  Houston, TX (IAH)
$26 a day in:  Indianapolis, IN (IND)
$24 a day in:  Milwaukee, WI (MKE)
$29 a day in:  New Orleans, LA (MSY)
$21 a day in:  Raleigh-Durham, NC (RDU)
$23 a day in:  Richmond, VA (RIC)
$23 a day in:  Orange County, CA (SNA)

To receive your special Continental Airlines CO.O.L. Travel Specials discounted
rates, simply make your reservations in advance and be sure to request Product
Code COOLUS.  To make your reservation, contact National at 1-800-CAR-RENT
(1-800-227-7368), or book your reservation online at
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760BmM20Ow0D7m0Aa
Please enter COOLUS in the Product Rate Code field, and 5037126 in the Contract
ID field to ensure you get these rates on these dates.

* If you are traveling to a city or a different date that is not listed,
National offers great rates when you book online at:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760BmM20Ow0DwD0Ax

For complete details on these offers, please refer to National's terms and
conditions below.

****************************************
5. CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS LAST-MINUTE WEEKEND
RATES FROM WESTIN HOTELS & RESORTS, SHERATON HOTELS
& RESORTS, FOUR POINTS BY SHERATON, ST. REGIS,
THE LUXURY COLLECTION, AND W HOTELS

Visit our site for booking these and other Last-Minute Weekend Rates for
this weekend June 8- June 12, 2001.
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760BmM20Ow0D7n0Ab

--------------------------------------
California - Costa Mesa - The Westin South Coast Plaza - $88.00
California - Ontario - Sheraton Ontario Airport Hotel - $51.00

Connecticut - Danbury - Sheraton Danbury Hotel - $89.00
Connecticut - Stamford - The Westin Stamford - $71.00
Connecticut - Stamford - Sheraton Stamford Hotel - $77.00

Indiana - Indianapolis - The Westin Indianapolis - $87.00
Indiana - Indianapolis - Sheraton Indianapolis Hotel & Suites - $64.00

Louisiana - Baton Rouge - Sheraton Baton Rouge Convention Center Hotel - $77.00
Louisiana - New Orleans - W New Orleans - $159.00

Massachusetts - Boston - Sheraton Boston Hotel - $189.00
Massachusetts - Braintree - Sheraton Braintree Hotel - $119.00
Massachusetts - Burlington - Four Points by Sheraton Burlington - $77.00
Massachusetts - Framingham - Sheraton Framingham Hotel - $97.00
Massachusetts - Needham - Sheraton Needham Hotel - $107.00
Massachusetts - Newton - Sheraton Newton Hotel - $109.00
Massachusetts - Wakefield - Sheraton Colonial Hotel and Golf Club Boston -
$90.00
Massachusetts - Waltham - The Westin Waltham-Boston - $90.00
Massachusetts - Waltham - Four Points by Sheraton Waltham - $75.00

New Hampshire - Manchester - Four Points by Sheraton Manchester - $79.00
New Hampshire - Nashua - Sheraton Nashua Hotel - $70.00

New Jersey - Edison - Sheraton Edison Hotel Raritan Center - $75.00
New Jersey - Parsippany - Sheraton Parsippany Hotel - $70.00
New Jersey - Piscataway - Four Points by Sheraton Piscataway - $65.00
New Jersey - Woodbridge - Sheraton at Woodbridge Place Hotel - $71.00

New York - Jamaica - Sheraton JFK Airport Hotel - $110.00
New York - New York - Essex House - A Westin Hotel - $228.00
New York - New York City - Sheraton Russell Hotel - $179.00
New York - New York City - Sheraton Manhattan Hotel - $169.00
New York - New York City - Sheraton New York Hotel and Towers - $169.00
New York - Niagara Falls - Four Points by Sheraton Niagara Falls - $84.00

North Carolina - Chapel Hill - Sheraton Chapel Hill Hotel - $77.00
North Carolina - Durham - Sheraton Imperial Hotel and Convention Center - $55.00

Ohio - Cincinnati - The Westin Cincinnati - $90.00
Ohio - Independence - Four Points by Sheraton Cleveland South - $65.00

Rhode Island - Warwick - Sheraton Providence Airport Hotel - $79.00

Tennessee - Nashville - Sheraton Music City - $59.00

Texas - Houston - The Westin Galleria Houston - $64.00
Texas - Houston - Sheraton North Houston at George Bush Intercontinental -
$64.00
Texas - Houston - Sheraton Houston Brookhollow Hotel - $45.00
Texas - Houston - The Westin Oaks - $70.00

Wisconsin - Brookfield - Sheraton Milwaukee Brookfield Hotel - $65.00

For complete details on these offers, please refer to the terms and
conditions below.

****************************************
6. CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS ON HILTON HOTELS AND RESORTS

The following rates are available June 9-11, 2001 and are priced per night.
--------------------------------------
Austin, TX - Hilton Austin North - $99
Austin, TX - Doubletree Guest Suites Austin - $139

Boston, MA - Hilton Boston Logan Airport - - $179
Boston, MA - Doubletree Guest Suites Boston - $169
Boston, MA - Doubletree Hotel Boston-Downtown - $149

Cleveland, OH - Hilton Garden Inn Cleveland Airport. - $89
Cleveland, OH - Hilton Cleveland East/Beachwood, Beachwood, OH. - $109

Houston, TX - Hilton Houston Southwest - $109
Houston, TX - Hilton Houston Plaza - $79/Night, 6/9-10

Indianapolis, IN - Doubletree Guest Suites Indianapolis/Carmel - $89

Newark, NJ - Hilton Rye Town, Rye Brook, NY. - $129/Night, 6/9-10
Newark, NJ - Hilton New York, New York, NY.- $179

New Orleans, LA - Hilton Garden Inn New Orleans Downtown - $69
New Orleans, LA - Doubletree Hotel New Orleans-Lakeside, Metairie, LA. -
$69/Night, 6/9-10

Orange County, CA - Hilton Port of Los Angeles/San Pedro, San Pedro, CA. - $139
Orange County, CA - Hilton Long Beach, Long Beach, CA. - $79
Orange County, CA - Hilton Irvine/Orange County Airport, Irvine, CA. - $169

Raleigh, NC - Hilton North Raleigh - $119

Tucson, AZ - Doubletree Guest Suites Tucson - $59

To book this week's special rates for Hilton Family Hotels, visit and book at
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760BmM20Ow0jWG0A7

Special rates apply only for the dates listed at each hotel and are subject to
availability. Check hilton.com for specific dates at each Hilton Family Hotel.
Or call at 1-800-774-1500 and ask for Value Rates. Restrictions apply to these
rates.

****************************************
CO.O.L. TRAVEL SPECIALS RULES:
Fares include a $37.20 fuel surcharge. Passenger Facility Charges, up to $12
depending on routing, are not included. Up to $2.75 per segment federal excise
tax, as applicable, is not included. Applicable International and or Canadian
taxes and fees up to $88, varying by destination, are not included and may vary
slightly depending on currency exchange rate at the time of purchase. For a
complete listing of rules please visit:
http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760BmM20Ow0nZn0As

ALAMO RENT A CAR'S TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Taxes (including VLF taxes up to US$1.89 per day in California and GST), other
governmentally-authorized or imposed surcharges, license recoupment fees, fuel,
additional driver fee, drop charges and optional items (such as CDW Waiver
Savers(R) up to US$18.99 a day,) are extra. Renter must meet standard age,
driver and credit requirements. Rates higher for drivers under age 25.
Concession recoupment fees may add up to 14% to the rental rate at some
on-airport locations. Up to 10.75% may be added to the rental rate if you rent
at an off-airport location and exit on our shuttle bus. Weekly rates require a
5-day minimum rental or daily rates apply. For weekend rates, the vehicle must
be picked up after 9 a.m. on Thursday and returned before midnight on Monday or
higher daily rates apply. 24-hour advance reservation required. May not be
combined with other discounts. Availability is limited. All vehicles must be
returned to the country of origin. Offer not valid in San Jose, CA.

NATIONAL CAR RENTAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
Customer must provide Contract ID# at the time of reservation to be eligible
for discounts. Offer valid at participating National locations in the US and
Canada. Minimum rental age is 25. This offer is not valid with any other
special discount or promotion. Standard rental qualifications apply. Subject
to availability and blackout dates. Advance reservations required.
Geographic driving restrictions may apply.

TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR WESTIN, SHERATON, FOUR POINTS,
ST. REGIS, THE LUXURY COLLECTION, AND W HOTELS:
Offer is subject to availability. Advance Reservations required and is based on
single/double occupancy. Offer not applicable to group travel. Additional
Service charge and tax may apply. The discount is reflected in the rate quoted.
Offer valid at participating hotel only. Offer valid for stays on Fri - Mon with
a Friday or Saturday night arrival required. Rate available for this coming
weekend only. Offer available only by making reservations via the internet. A
limited number of rooms may be available at these rates.

http://airmail.continental.com/cgi-bin5/flo?y=eD760BmM20Ow0FG20At

---------------------------------------
This E-mail message and its contents are copyrighted and are proprietary
products of Continental Airlines, Inc.  Any unauthorized use, reproduction,
or transfer of the message or its content, in any medium, is strictly
prohibited.

****************************************
UNFORTUNATELY MAIL SENT TO THIS ADDRESS CANNOT BE ANSWERED.
PLEASE SEND ALL INQUIRIES TO: mailto:


Prompt:
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Tamara Carter" <


Prompt:
Well, I volunteer to baby sit too.  And I don't live on the edge of the
earth.  Although- I'm not up for the breast-feeding part....

hahaha
Angie

From: "Germany, Chris" <Chris.Germany@ENRON.com>
To: "Angie Zeman" <


Prompt:
I was asked to forward this revision to you.
---------------------- Forwarded by Brian Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas on
03/15/2000
11:38 AM ---------------------------

KIM NOVSEK BIZIK
03/15/2000 11:37 AM

To: Doug Kinney/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas, Brian
Perrone/CES/ColumbiaGas@ColumbiaGas
cc:
Subject: Capacity Offer

Please forward this revision to Chris Germany.

---------------------- Forwarded by Kim Novsek Bizik/CES/ColumbiaGas on
03/15/2000 11:36 AM ---------------------------


Prompt:
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 02/17/2000 09:30
AM ---------------------------

"Diza, Alain D" <


Prompt:
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 05/08/2000 04:55
PM ---------------------------

"Stephanie L. Spencer" <


Prompt:
Dear ICE Participant,

As per your request, we have set up a new user ID and Password for the
following user on ICE.

Chris Germany-713-853-4743 (Trader-Financial Gas, Trader-Physical Gas)

Please call the IntercontinentalExchange Atlanta HelpDesk, at your
convenience, to receive them.
+1-770-738-21011
Mon (12am) - Fri (5pm) EST.

Thank you,
Ken Adams
IntercontinentalExchange, LLC
2100 RiverEdge Parkway
Fourth Floor
Atlanta, GA 30328
Office: +1 770 738 2101
Email:


Prompt:
Refunds are always so much fun.  I suppose we would need to give some back to
BUG if this happens.
---------------------- Forwarded by Chris Germany/HOU/ECT on 10/08/2000 11:21
AM ---------------------------

"Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com> on 09/25/2000 10:42:54 AM
To: "Brown, Daryl" <Daryl.Brown@Williams.com>, "Fiser, Michael"
<Michael.Fiser@Williams.com>, "'


Prompt:
You the Man!!

Pipeline contacts

Toni Garcia  713-420-3663  Tennessee/Midwestern/East Tennessee
Stephanie Spencer  713-627-5025 Texas Eastern/Algonquin
Greg Synder  304-623-8268  CNG Transmission
David Schoellkopf 713-215-4625  Transco

I know the CNG person is the right person to talk to but everone else may
refer you to another department.

"Clayton J. Vernon" <


Prompt: Mike & Suzie Heiser


Prompt:
Audrey is doing great.  Dad is doing good. Mom is fair.  She's still struggleing with the new Mom stuff.  Not quite the picture book story she had hoped for.  Can't just hop up and do what she wants anymore.  She's a big advocate for birth control now!!

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"James S. Homco" <


Prompt:
The baby would be automatically covered for up to 30 days.  I would need to get a social security number and then file the paper work.

Call 1-800-332-7979 for more information.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Chris Germany" <


Prompt:
Probably spending the night there.  You should go and have a goooood time.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Immer, Ingrid" <Ingrid.Immer@Williams.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Tuesday, March 12, 2002 10:16 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	FW: Robin & Peter Vint's going away party -  Friday March 15th  -	 boo hoo.....

When are you getting back on Friday?

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Robin Vint [SMTP:vint@bionexusventures.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, March 12, 2002 10:14 AM
> To:	Immer, Ingrid (E-mail)
> Subject:	FW: Robin & Peter Vint's going away party -  Friday March
> 15th  - boo hoo.....
>
> Hey girl!!  Margaret is throwing us a going away party on Friday. Hope
> that
> you and Crhis can make it.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Margaret Ceconi [mailto:Margaretc@mfslhou.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 2:56 PM
> To: plw@account-source.com; cgonthr@aol.com; JillvV@aol.com;
> JTREVELISE@aol.com; Mathisconner@aol.com; MMann1056@aol.com;
> mswblueeyes@aol.com; spine96@aol.com; mark.mclain@asmmex.com;
> timothyburton@attbi.com; levans@awesomenet.net;
> chiggins@banksterling.com; jwasinger@bdo.com;
> newton@bionexusventures.com; Helen.Woodby@compassbnk.com;
> hhw1@compassbnk.com; ssoriero@comsys.com; Cisneros.Susan@corp.sysco.com;
> KLee@diamondmccarthy.com; greg.sharp@enron.com;
> Victor.Lamadrid@ENRON.com; Denae_Umbower@ENRON.net;
> jon.trevelise@eott.com; Beth.Guido@gecapital.com;
> gkchouston@hotmail.com; randallchuck@hotmail.com;
> chuck-johnson@houston.rr.com; dafike@houston.rr.com;
> gregcaudell@houston.rr.com; hbertram@houston.rr.com;
> kfrumkin@houston.rr.com; kkeeney@houston.rr.com;
> maureenraymond@houston.rr.com; mcourtney@houston.rr.com;
> MROBICHAUX@houston.rr.com; mvalles@houston.rr.com;
> rrathvon@houston.rr.com; bbersin@intecap.com; joe@joeheller.com;
> BETH.LAWRENCE@jpmorgan.com; TeriD@metronational.com; Darlene Plumly;
> peteandteri@msn.com; kingjt@nortelnetworks.com;
> Jsummerford@notrecap.com; jnewman@powerbond.com; Jeff.Grill@Rbcdain.com;
> pamela@roomredo.com; mkanarellis@simulis.com;
> kristie.williams@sternhillpartners.com; susan.boyce@tbg-inc.com;
> charley.ballmer@ubswarburg.com; victor.lamadrid@ubswarburg.com;
> Obie.OBrien@usa.apachecorp.com; jgarvey@walkerzanger.com;
> tpursell@weingarten.com; Laurie.Evans@Williams.com;
> annasturgis@yahoo.com; bobbyshapouri23@yahoo.com;
> denniskbrown2002@yahoo.com; jwb_baker@yahoo.com;


Prompt:
I'll be at the Texas Gas shin dig.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Goodell, Scott
Sent:	Thursday, September 27, 2001 7:24 AM
To:	Germany, Chris
Subject:	??????

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Overton, Michelle" <Michelle.Overton@ElPaso.com>@ENRON [mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Overton+2C+20Michelle+22+20+3CMichelle+2EOverton+40ElPaso+2Ecom+3E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent:	Wednesday, September 26, 2001 3:50 PM
To:	Goodell, Scott
Cc:	Grindal, Corey
Subject:	Golf

Hey Scott -

Do you and Chris Germany want to join Corey and I for golf the afternoon of
Oct 12th?  That way I can pick your brain for hours...just kidding:)

Michelle R. Overton
Principal Capacity Trader
El Paso Corporation Eastern Pipeline Group
Nine Greenway Plaza
Houston, Tx 77046
(832)676-5128
fax (832)676-1605


Prompt:
thanks buddy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Lamadrid, Victor" <Victor.Lamadrid@ubswenergy.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, May 15, 2002 6:14 PM
To:	Germany, Chris
Cc:	tcarter@sequentenergy.com; angiez_1@hotmail.com;


Prompt:
FYI
 -----Original Message-----
From:


Prompt:
Wait just a minute.  Don't Goodell and I get a wedding invite?  Maybe we want to give you an expensive gift!  YEAH RIGHT!!!!!!   We are poorer than college students now.  I think you should send us an invite anyway.  Maybe I could make a bachelor party out of it.  At least I could get drunk.  So do you have all that wedding crap stuff done or is your MAN taking care of all that?  I always heard that it was WOMAN's work anyway.

Those are fantastic grades.  You would have to ADD my old college grades together to get a 3.83, and I still think it would be a struggle.  I know you told me but I can't remember, whets is your major?  MBA?

Its good to hear about Alicia.  Is she going to grad school?

I don't know when me and my very pregnant girlfriend are getting married.  We move in together at the end of Feb.  I'm nervous about that.  I've been living alone since '97 and I just don't know why all you foolish people want to get married and live together.  I took some digital photo's of her yesterday.  I'll let you know if I get them on the web so you can take a look and make fun of me being a 40 year old father to be.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Crystal Hyde <


Prompt:
 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"James S. Homco" <jhomco@minutemaid.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, May 20, 2002 1:01 PM
To:	jay.blaine@elpaso.com; jzurita@houston.rr.com; tcarter@sequent.com; slboudreaux@duke.com; Germany, Chris; tricia.spence@aquilla.com; Umbower, Denae; Lamadrid, Victor; Garcia, Clarissa; Kelly, Katherine L.; kbourgieos@totalfinaelf.com; danderson@houstonexp.com; Allwein, Robert; Ordway, Chris; egraff@coral-energy.com; stan.chapman@elpaso.com; bosoria@reliant.com; markgraff@prodigy.net; Schrab, Mark L.; jmcrawford@duke-energy.com; Patton, Anita K.; Baker, Briant; beverly.b.beaty@williams.com; kloocke@nisource.com; Goodell, Scott; Calcagno, Suzanne;


Prompt:
Ruth, remember that moorning you "allegedly" called me from Shemin's office last week?  You said you were meeting with Shemin and wouldn't be in for awhile.  I told you to ask Shemin "What the hell is going on with Dominion?  What's the latest?".  Well that's what this is.  Never got me an answer on that now did you?  I'm betting you and Shemin were at the Waffle House smokin'  cig's, drinking coffee, and eating hash browns that were "covered" with cheese and filled with "chunks" of ham

Shemin, how about an update on Dominion?  What's the word?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Proctor, Shemin V." <sproctor@akllp.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Friday, April 05, 2002 11:47 AM
To:	Concannon, Ruth;


Prompt:
Thanks for writing buddy.  Things are going very well on the home front.  Things began to improve after you and I had our little chat before Christmas and they have been improving ever since.  I really do appreciate it.

How's work at Enron?  Good question.  I started taking my vacation on the 27th.  I'm scheduled to be out until the 14th to use up all of my 2001 vacation.  I honestly believe some of us will be let go this week or next week.  But then its anybodys guess these days too.  I do check my emails from home and thats when I got your message.  There isn't anything to do at work right now.  I guess we should hear something this week.

How are things going with you?

-----Original Message-----
From: "Chris Meyer" <


Prompt:
Try 713-646-6344 per the Enron Operator.

"Vicki S. Acheson" <


Prompt:
thx buddy

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Steven Gillespie" <


Prompt:
Will do.  Thanks for the info.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Joan P Morgan" <


Prompt:
Hey Matt.  Sorry about not getting back to you sooner.  I probably won't move
for another 9 months.  I have some legal issues I'm heavily involved in that
will be taking up a lot of my time.

Thanks.

"Matt" <


Prompt:
Here is another motion.  Maybe we can get them to agree in using the transportation protocol process as a solution.

Ruth

P.S.  Is this pipeline one of mine?

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Kelly, Neil
Sent:	Thursday, May 23, 2002 4:27 PM
To:	Sharp, Vicki; Mann, Kay; Gray, Barbara N.; Aronowitz, Alan; Keller, James E.; Darmitzel, Paul; Maynard, Michelle; 'Melanie Gray (E-mail)'; White, Bonnie; 'marshall.turner@weil.com'; Culver, Deborah; 'mark.ellenberg@cwt.com'; Lyons, Dan; 'steve.loden@weil.com'; 'Loretta Cross (E-mail)'; Concannon, Ruth; '


Prompt:
Call me if you have any questions at 713-853-4743.

Thanks

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	Germany, Chris
Sent:	Tuesday, February 05, 2002 2:21 PM
To:	'


Prompt:
Chris,

I think that it makes more sense if we send out our form to you.  We have no
problem w/ the changes to force majeure, but most of the other issues raised
in the GISB will present problems for us.  Specifically, we are unable to
agree to TX law, any arbitration, as well as spot price method of damages.
Additionally, it is of key importance to us that we have an order in place
w/ the bankruptcy court permitting both the contract, including the
transactions, and for Sempra to close-out and terminate any transactions in
the event that Enron converts its case to a Chapter 7.  We would require the
GISB to have language referencing such an order.

I will ask our Contract Administration group to send this out today.  I will
not be in the office this afternoon and tomorrow, but if you want we can
discuss on Friday.

Marcia Greenblatt
Vice President and Associate Counsel
Sempra Energy Trading Corp.
58 Commerce Road
Stamford, CT 06902
Tel:  203-355-5405
Fax: 203-355-5410


Prompt:
 -----Original Message-----
From:  "Cagle, Donna" <DCAGLE@mariner-energy.com>@ENRON
[mailto:IMCEANOTES-+22Cagle+2C+20Donna+22+20+3CDCAGLE+40mariner-energy+2Ecom+3
E+40ENRON@ENRON.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:54 PM
To: Edison, Deborah J.
Cc: Melendrez, Jesus
Subject: Mariner Management Meeting Minutes

 <<SUMMARY.xls>>  <<5-31-01.doc>>

Donna M. Cagle
Executive Administrator to President & CEO
Mariner Energy, Inc.
580 WestLake Park Blvd., Suite 1300
Houston, TX  77079
281/584-5511 (phone)     281/584-5515 (fax)


Prompt:
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/28/2000 11:05 AM -----

	Karen Denne
	11/27/2000 04:33 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject: Duke Energy proposes to manage SDG&E's entire electricity load for
five years

fyi...
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 11/27/2000
03:58 PM ---------------------------


Prompt:
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/28/2000 11:05 AM -----

	Karen Denne
	11/27/2000 04:33 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject: Duke Energy proposes to manage SDG&E's entire electricity load for
five years

fyi...
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 11/27/2000
03:58 PM ---------------------------

tcwillia@duke-energy.com on 11/27/2000 02:23:42 PM
To: "Andy Brown (IEP)" <runwithmee@aol.com>, Bob Escalante at Constellation
<Bob.escalante@powersrc.com>, Curtis Keebler at Reliant
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, Greg Blue <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Jack
Pigott @ Calpine" <jackp@calpine.com>, Jan Smutny-Jones <smutny@iepa.com>,
"Joe Ronan @ Calpine" <joer@calpine.com>, John Stout for Reliant
<


Prompt:
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/28/2000 11:05 AM -----

	Karen Denne
	11/27/2000 04:33 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject: Duke Energy proposes to manage SDG&E's entire electricity load for
five years

fyi...
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 11/27/2000
03:58 PM ---------------------------

tcwillia@duke-energy.com on 11/27/2000 02:23:42 PM
To: "Andy Brown (IEP)" <runwithmee@aol.com>, Bob Escalante at Constellation
<Bob.escalante@powersrc.com>, Curtis Keebler at Reliant
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, Greg Blue <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Jack
Pigott @ Calpine" <jackp@calpine.com>, Jan Smutny-Jones <smutny@iepa.com>,
"Joe Ronan @ Calpine" <joer@calpine.com>, John Stout for Reliant
<john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Julie @ Edson" <jmball@ns.net>, "Karen
Denne, Enron" <kdenne@enron.com>, Karen Edson <kedson@ns.net>, "Kassandra
Gough @ Calpine" <kgough@calpine.com>, Katie at IEP <kaplan@iepa.com>, Lynn
Lednicky at Dynegy <lale@dynegy.com>, Marty Wilson <


Prompt:
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/28/2000 11:05 AM -----

	Karen Denne
	11/27/2000 04:33 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject: Duke Energy proposes to manage SDG&E's entire electricity load for
five years

fyi...
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 11/27/2000
03:58 PM ---------------------------

tcwillia@duke-energy.com on 11/27/2000 02:23:42 PM
To: "Andy Brown (IEP)" <runwithmee@aol.com>, Bob Escalante at Constellation
<Bob.escalante@powersrc.com>, Curtis Keebler at Reliant
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, Greg Blue <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Jack
Pigott @ Calpine" <jackp@calpine.com>, Jan Smutny-Jones <smutny@iepa.com>,
"Joe Ronan @ Calpine" <joer@calpine.com>, John Stout for Reliant
<john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Julie @ Edson" <jmball@ns.net>, "Karen
Denne, Enron" <kdenne@enron.com>, Karen Edson <kedson@ns.net>, "Kassandra
Gough @ Calpine" <kgough@calpine.com>, Katie at IEP <kaplan@iepa.com>, Lynn
Lednicky at Dynegy <lale@dynegy.com>, Marty Wilson <mwilson@pstrategies.com>,
Paula Hall-Collins <paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "Richard Hyde, Duke"
<


Prompt:
----- Forwarded by Steven J Kean/NA/Enron on 11/28/2000 11:05 AM -----

	Karen Denne
	11/27/2000 04:33 PM

		 To: Steven J Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Jeff
Dasovich/NA/Enron@Enron, Paul Kaufman/PDX/ECT@ECT, Sandra
McCubbin/NA/Enron@Enron, Mona L Petrochko/NA/Enron@Enron, Mark
Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Peggy Mahoney/HOU/EES@EES
		 cc:
		 Subject: Duke Energy proposes to manage SDG&E's entire electricity load for
five years

fyi...
---------------------- Forwarded by Karen Denne/Corp/Enron on 11/27/2000
03:58 PM ---------------------------

tcwillia@duke-energy.com on 11/27/2000 02:23:42 PM
To: "Andy Brown (IEP)" <runwithmee@aol.com>, Bob Escalante at Constellation
<Bob.escalante@powersrc.com>, Curtis Keebler at Reliant
<curtis_l_kebler@reliantenergy.com>, Greg Blue <gtbl@dynegy.com>, "Jack
Pigott @ Calpine" <jackp@calpine.com>, Jan Smutny-Jones <smutny@iepa.com>,
"Joe Ronan @ Calpine" <joer@calpine.com>, John Stout for Reliant
<john_h_stout@reliantenergy.com>, "Julie @ Edson" <jmball@ns.net>, "Karen
Denne, Enron" <kdenne@enron.com>, Karen Edson <kedson@ns.net>, "Kassandra
Gough @ Calpine" <kgough@calpine.com>, Katie at IEP <kaplan@iepa.com>, Lynn
Lednicky at Dynegy <lale@dynegy.com>, Marty Wilson <mwilson@pstrategies.com>,
Paula Hall-Collins <paula.hall-collins@williams.com>, "Richard Hyde, Duke"
<rwhyde@duke-energy.com>, Rob Lamkin <rllamkin@seiworldwide.com>, Roger
Pelote <roger.pelote@williams.com>, Stephanie Newell at Reliant
<


Prompt:
Jay Perl
Sempra Energy Trading

phone: 203-355-5074
cell: 914-261-6025
email:


Prompt:
The attached News Release was distributed via PRNewswire 06/19/01 at
3:04 pm.  If you have any questions please contact myself or Frank Pici at
(281) 584-5500.

Kimm Cashiola
Executive Assistant to VP - Finance & CFO
End User Support Help Desk
(281) 584-5571
 <mailto:


Prompt:
There will not be a call on Thursday, June 14.

Janette Elbertson
Enron Wholesale Services
Legal Department - EB3326
Telephone:  (713) 853-7906
Fax:  (713) 646-2600
janette.elbertson@enron.com
----- Forwarded by Janette Elbertson/HOU/ECT on 06/07/2001 10:15 AM -----

	Janette Elbertson
	06/07/2001 10:07 AM

		 To: Al_Alexanderson@pgn.com,


Prompt:
---------------------- Forwarded by Eric Thode/Corp/Enron on 11/22/2000 02:02
PM ---------------------------

	Enron North America Corp.

	From:  Robert Hemstock @ ECT                           11/22/2000 01:58 PM

To: Richard B Sanders/HOU/ECT@ECT, Richard Shapiro/NA/Enron@Enron, Aleck
Dadson/TOR/ECT@ECT, Mark Palmer/Corp/Enron@ENRON, Steven J
Kean/NA/Enron@Enron, Eric Thode/Corp/Enron@ENRON, TMcLaren@GPC.CA,


Prompt:
To:???? Greg Whalley
Email:? Greg.Whalley@enron.com
Date:?? May 18, 2001
From:?? Loraine Crutchfield
Re:???? LNG's Role in North American & Caribbean Gas Supply Conference

Thank you for agreeing to speak at the LNG's Role in North American &
Caribbean Gas Supply Conference.? Below, you will find deadlines for
materials due to conference management, your presentation title, date of your
presentation, presentation time from beginning to end, duration and question
& answer time.? You may simply email the materials to me directly at


Prompt:
---------------------- Forwarded by Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron on 12/12/2000
02:42 PM ---------------------------

Kathy Mayfield
12/12/2000 02:01 PM

To: Rosalee Fleming/Corp/Enron@ENRON
cc:
Subject: Thank you for the Charitygift

A nice note from Anne . . .

---------------------- Forwarded by Kathy Mayfield/Corp/Enron on 12/12/2000
01:33 PM ---------------------------


Prompt:
---------------------- Forwarded by Greg Whalley/HOU/ECT on 09/19/2000 02:46
PM ---------------------------

"Benjamin Bergfelt" <


Prompt:
 <<CSFB_EnergyTech_dec7.pdf>>

Summary of Energy Technology Bulletin:

* Siemens Westinghouse and four European utilities have formed a
consortium to build a 1 MW hybrid power generation plant that will combine a
Siemens solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) and a microturbine, which will be
supplied by the consortium utilities.  The unit will be tested as a
pre-commercial system for the European market and is expected to be in
operation by October 2003 at an Energie Baden-Wurttenberg AG (EnBW) facility
in Marbach, Germany.
* Two European utilities have awarded Siemens Westinghouse contracts
for their tubular solid oxide fuel cell system.  The two pre-commercial
units, one of which will be delivered to RWE Power AG in Essen (February
2002) and the other to Edison Spa in Milan (September 2002), will be 300kW
hybrid systems incorporating a microturbine and operating on natural gas.
* Real estate companies Arden Realty, CALPERS and RREEF dedicated two
large commercial solar power systems yesterday in Los Angeles.  The first
installation features nearly an acre of photovoltaic panels located on the
roof of a three-story office building owned by Arden Realty while the second
is located on an industrial building in Carlsbad, CA that is jointly owned
by CALPERS and RREEF (joint venture company is named CalWest Industrial
Properties).  Real Energy Corporation will sell the power generated by these
systems to the respective building owners.  Edison Development Corp., a
subsidiary of DTE Energy, supplied the solar panels that were built and
installed by PowerLight Corporation.

Regards,

Cameron Jeffreys
Associate
Energy Technology Research
CREDIT | FIRST
SUISSE | BOSTON
Voice: 416 352 4581
Fax: 416 352 4598
Email:


Prompt:
Ken and Mike...here it goes again since it seems like the first message did
not go through...best regards, Herbert Arturo Molina

------Original Message------
From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <postoffice@staff.juno.com>
To:


Prompt:
You're e-mailing me on Greg's address book.  It's because I responded to your
first address from his e-mail and I thought I was in my address book.

Honey,  please feel better soon.  I'm saying a prayer for you right now.  I'm
glad I put a smile on your face (and what a handsome face it is).    Liz

"Hoskins, Kenneth" <


Prompt:
Brad,

Greg asked that I drop you a line to apologize for not getting back with you
as of yet.  He's running a bit behind on things.  Please look for a call from
him  on tomorrow, Friday, June 2.

It was good seeing you again.  Take Care.

Liz Taylor
713-853-1935
Liz.M.Taylor@enron.com

Bradley Romine <


Prompt:
Brad,

Greg asked that I drop you a line to apologize for not getting back with you
as of yet.  He's running a bit behind on things.  Please look for a call from
him  on tomorrow, Friday, June 2.

It was good seeing you again.  Take Care.

Liz Taylor
713-853-1935
Liz.M.Taylor@enron.com

Bradley Romine <bradleyromine@yahoo.com> on 05/30/2000 09:50:32 PM
To: gwhalle@enron.com
cc:
Subject: Interviews

Hey Greg,
I enjoyed interviewing with both you and Jim last week
friday. I would like to talk to you some more about
the opportunities available in Enron Networks. Two
areas I thought would be interesting would either be
helping to structure a market for Enron Networks to
enter, or help develop a market that Enron Networks is
in the process of entering.

A couple of things that I thought were interesting
about your strategy for B2B is that unlike most
business plans where the strategy is build the site
and the volume will come, Enron uses it's own volume
to entice other people to participate. What most
e-commerce sites want to do is charge for the dating
process, but in reality this has very little value
added unless the market is coupled with a
finance/clearinghouse function and a physical delivary
system for physical goods. We addressed some of these
issues in the ilogex business plan.

I have attached a copy of the ilogex business plan to
give you an idea of some of my thoughts on e-commerce.
 I look forward to talking to you tommorrow morning.

Thanks,
Brad

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/
X-Apparently-To: bradleyromine@yahoo.com via web4505.mail.yahoo.com
X-Track: 1: 40
Received: from elaine26.Stanford.EDU (171.64.15.101)  by
mta220.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 May 2000 06:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (bradley@localhost) by elaine26.Stanford.EDU
(8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA08754 for <bradleyromine@yahoo.com>; Tue, 16
May 2000 06:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: elaine26.Stanford.EDU: bradley owned process doing
-bs
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 06:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: bradley romine <


Prompt:
Thank you.  You guys are great and fast !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Tracey Tripp <


Prompt:
Hi Rick,

Per your voicemail yesterday, here is the information you requested:

Tom Boren President & Chief Executive Officer
Chris Iribe President & Chief Operating Officer, East Region

Please let me know if you need anything else.

Have a wonderful holiday.

Liz Fricke

-----Original Message-----
From: Buy, Rick [mailto:Rick.Buy@ENRON.com]
Sent: Friday, December 14, 2001 11:29 AM
To: Fricke, Liz
Subject: RE: Travel arrangements for 12/12/2001 and 12/13/01
Sensitivity: Confidential

Liz- Trip and dinner meeting went well. I have receipts for expenses so
if you can tell me how to process I will. Thanks for all your help. Rick
Buy

-----Original Message-----
From: Fricke, Liz [mailto:


Prompt:
Steve

I have validated the curve shift data against the official internal daily position and p&l reports (which report total p&l) and am generally comfortable with the original curve-shift numbers. The differences betweeen the two are due to the following components of profit and loss, i.e. those which price moves against a day's closing position do not capture:

1    Intra day positioning (in the forward and cash markets)
2    New deals against our mid curve
3    Liquidity and other reserve movements
4    Liquidation (i.e. where forward mark-to-market value drops out of the forward book and into cash)

The data set you have is the one we use to test the efficacy of our VaR models and I would be cautious in their use for predicting profitability. Hence total p&l is the best indicator since it includes all the value changes in the book.

I imagine you are using some measure of return on risk to predict p&l (RoVaR, for example). We have done similar studies for presentation to our Board, amongst others. Let me know if this analysis would be useful to you - we would be happy to provide it.

Regards
David

-----Original Message-----
From: steve allen [mailto:


Prompt:
Saturday, December 29, 2001

Richard B Buy
Enron
,

Dear Richard,

Good Morning.

Thank you very much for your suggestions and input with my search for
KWI.  We are at the final stages of that search and have identified an
exciting superior candidate  for that position.

I am writing to ask for your input and suggestions regarding another early
stage Software Company in the Energy space.  They are located in Atlanta
Georgia.  The positon we are seeking to fill is an SVP of Sales.  This
will be a key position,  part of the Executive Management team and will
be integral to driving our client towards profitability and ultimately
an IPO.  If you have any ideas of exciting potential candidates or if
you have an interest your self, please contact meat 781-874-0527 or email
me at


Prompt:
ISDA International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.
600 Fifth Avenue
Rockefeller Center - 27th floor
New York, NY 10020
U.S.A.

URGENT!!  URGENT!!  URGENT!!  URGENT!!  URGENT!!  URGENT!!  URGENT!!

Please note that the Trading Practice Committee Meeting scheduled for this
evening at 6:00 at the offices of Bank of America has been postponed until
further notice.  Kindly acknowledge by replying to this message.

**IF YOU HAVE CONFIRMED TO ATTEND ON BEHALF OF YOURSELF AND/OR YOUR
COLLEAGUES, KINDLY FORWARD THIS MESSAGE TO THEM IMMEDIATELY**

Scott Marra
Administrator for Policy and Media Relations
International Swaps and Derivatives Association
600 Fifth Avenue
Rockefeller Center - 27th floor
New York, NY 10020
Phone: (212) 332-2578
Fax: (212) 332-1212
Email:


Prompt:
send non-enron- email.

-----Original Message-----
From: Buy, Rick [mailto:Rick.Buy@enron.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 8:44 AM
To: Fishkin, Charles A
Subject: RE: NOTE

thanks for note. laid off two thirds of staff on monday. have learned a
tremendous amount and may go on lecture circuit. i wonder if a board of
directors would pay to hear my story? all is ok thanks, rick

-----Original Message-----
From: Fishkin, Charles A [mailto:


Prompt:
Airfare is 522.50 nonrefundable per person. Service fee is 30.00 per person
nonrefundable.
Please advise if ok to ticket and which credit card you will be using.

Thanks,
Sheryl Blackman
Alliance Worldwide
(formerly Travel Agency in the Park)
(713) 650-8080
(713) 328-5157-direct


Prompt:
Dave, this proposed ruling by the CPUC drastically reduces the value of the California power commodity contracts.  There is a meeting at 11am in EB911 to discuss.  I'll let you know how it works out.  Jay

-----Original Message-----
From: Ralston, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 10:10 AM
To: Hachen, James
Subject: FW: Draft Decision on Retroactive Suspension of Direct
Access--Judge Proposes Retroactive Suspension Date: July 1,2002, and
other onerous terms

-----Original Message-----
From: Maynard, Michelle
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 4:29 PM
To: Ralston, Andrew
Subject: FW: Draft Decision on Retroactive Suspension of Direct
Access--Judge Proposes Retroactive Suspension Date: July 1,2002, and
other onerous terms

-----Original Message-----
From: Smith, Mike D.
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 3:39 PM
To: 'jklauber@llgm.com'; Maynard, Michelle; Keller, James E.; Darmitzel,
Paul; Higgason, Kelly; Essandoh, Edwin; Freed, Richard
Subject: FW: Draft Decision on Retroactive Suspension of Direct
Access--Judge Proposes Retroactive Suspension Date: July 1,2002, and
other onerous terms

UGH

-----Original Message-----
From: Dasovich, Jeff
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 3:36 PM
To: Blachman, Jeremy; Delainey, David W.; Steffes, James D.; Tribolet,
Michael; Mellencamp, Lisa; Leff, Dan; Schwarz, Angela; Frazier, Lamar;
Hughes, Evan; Huddleson, Diann; Dietrich, Janet; Belden, Tim; Comnes,
Alan; Calger, Christopher F.; Parquet, David; Sharp, Vicki; Smith, Mike
D.
Subject: FW: Draft Decision on Retroactive Suspension of Direct
Access--Judge Proposes Retroactive Suspension Date: July 1,2002, and
other onerous terms

FYI. Please forward to others who need this info.

As the market expected, the judge issued what arguably is a worst case scenario.  Recall that this is a judge's recommendation (working with Kommissioner Karl Wood).  The full commission will vote on it and two other commissioners will have to agree wtih Karl for the recommendation to stick (i.e., it takes 3 votes).

Somewhat surprising, the Commission is giving folks till February 1 to comment and have scheduled  the decision for a vote on February 7th.  I assume that the market will object fairly strongly to this schedule.

We'll be checking with other market participants to see how folks intend to attack the decision. If you have questions, let me know.

Best,
Jeff

-----Original Message-----
From: JBennett [mailto:JBennett@GMSSR.com]
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 3:22 PM
To:


Prompt:
Dear Rick,

I quickly wanted to send you my new contact information as well as ask you
about my Cash Balance Plan.  My fifth anniversary with Enron is coming up
this Sunday, December 9.

The Cash Balance Plan vests after five years and I want to make sure that
HR's comments to me regarding the plan are right.  HR (Sheila Walton) told
me last week that I need not to worry about vesting in the plan since we
will officially still be Enron employees as long as we are getting paid
severance.  With the latest information we got this seems to be questionable
now.  HR and Benefits do not seem to know what is going on now; all my
questions remained unanswered when I called them this morning.  Benefits
stated that as long as my termination date was after the 9th of December I
would vest.  HR doesn't seem to know when my official termination date is.
If needed, I have more than 10 days of unused vacation; I could be deemed on
vacation and terminated after the 9th.

I would like to ask you to help me with this matter and try to set my
termination date after December 9, i.e. at the earliest next Monday.  I feel
that the company has left us with absolutely nothing but an extreme lack of
information and loads of unanswered questions. I do not see myself in a
position where I want to give my Cash Balance Plan up.

My contact information is:
Carol North
651 Bering Dr. #1705
Houston, TX
77057

Tel: 713-972-1002 (hm) 713-530-4746 (mob)
email:


Prompt:
ok

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Elizabeth Bassine" <


Prompt:
It has been unreal. Would like to catch up. I may need a job! Looks like UBS has bought our trading operation which includes me for the moment anyway. Hope all is well on your end. Rick
-----Original Message-----
From: James Lam [mailto:


Prompt:
This appears to be OK and we should be able to sign on however please review the statement and let me know if you see a problem with our support of the PHC statement.  Sorry for the short notice and review time.  I'll not respond until noon tomorrow.  Thanks.

Glen

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"Gregory Klatt" <gregoryklatt@earthlink.net>@ENRON
Sent:	Monday, November 19, 2001 2:46 AM
To:	Hass, Glen; Harris, Steven
Cc:	Dan Douglass
Subject:	FW: A.01-09-024  PHC Statement draft

SoCalGas is circulating a draft pre-hearing conference statement for parties to sign on to, if they wish (please see attached).  Given Transwestern's position in the BCAP, it makes sense to sign on to SoCalGas' generic PHC statement.  Please take a few moments to review the same and let me know your thoughts.  SoCalGas has asked for a response by Tuesday noon.  Thanks.
----- Original Message -----
From: Parrott, Jeff
To: gloria.ing@sce.com ;mdm8@pge.com ;burkee@cts.com ;douglass@energyattorney.com ;gregoryklatt@earthlink.net ;pjpowerlaw@aol.com ;tpeterso@energy.state.ca.us ;marcel@turn.org ;chilen@llgm.com ;tomb@srossbordenenergy.com ;Thompso! n, Vicki L. ;Winter, Rodney ;Brill, Thomas R. ;fdeleon@energy.state.ca.us ;napedersen@jonesday.com ;plg@cpuc.ca.gov ;ek@a-klaw.com ;jkarp@whitecase.com ;bkc@pge.com ;Davis, Robert E. ;kcl@cpuc.ca.gov ;


Prompt:
That sounds great. I would like to spend as much time with you as possible so come as early as you can and stay as late as you want.

I actually thought the movie was pretty good. We'll see what we can come up with the next time.

I'll try not to eat too much this week ( I have to look good for you!).

Take care.

Steve
inal Message-----
From: 	"Christine Stokes" <


Prompt:
Don't forget my receipt.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"jhyatt" <


Prompt:
Don't forget my receipt.

 -----Original Message-----
From: 	"jhyatt" <jhyatt@email.msn.com>@ENRON
Sent:	Wednesday, December 19, 2001 11:00 PM
To:	Harris, Steven; Jeff Fawcett; Solis, Melissa; Neale, Nelson; Young, Kay; Roobaert, Preston; Hignojos, Robert; Jones, Dana; Wynne, Rita; Armstrong, Julie; Cherry, Rhenn; Borger, Fawn; Adams, Thomas; Hillegonds, Jennifer; Truss, Stephanie; Hayes, Karen; Sturr, Kathy; Frazier, Perry; Ron Matthews; Lynda Schoolcraft; Schoolcraft, Darrell; Blair, Jean; Washington, Kathy; Callans, Nancy; Porter, Diana; Carr, James; Renee Perry; Wehring, Linda; McCarran, Penny; Weller, Steve; Wadle, Susan; Moore, Jan; Chandler, Bob; Steve Herber
Cc:	lmfoust@aol.com; maffett@kingwoodcable.com;


Prompt:
FYI.

-----Original Message-----
From: Hills Greg [mailto:GHills@br-inc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 8:56 AM
To: Lokay, Michelle
Cc: Hinton John; Hanse Lee; Eason Robert; Cervin Pete
Subject: BR/TW Window Rock Meeting Scheduled for Dec 3rd

Michelle,
	We are looking forward to the planned meeting between BR and TW to further discuss the Window Rock interconnect.  The following is
an informal agenda listing of topics:

1.  BR would provide an overview of our November 6th discussions with EPNG regarding the Window Rock Interconnect.

2.   As discussed, it would be beneficial if TW would be able to discuss the operating parameters along TW's pipeline system prior to and
after the proposed Red Rock expansion.  In particular, BR would be interested in expected pressures/volumes at Window Rock, Station 4, 5 and
Thoreau prior to the expansion and after the expansion with 0mmcf/d, 50 mmcf/d, 100mmcf/d, and 150mmcf/d delivered at Window Rock into TW.
The Window Rock deliveries into TW would physically service markets to the west while allowing TW to reduce physical flow from the eastern
delivery points by providing the eastern backhaul service to BR.

3.  Discuss potential system or operating modifications to allow Window Rock deliveries.

4.  Review potential alternative delivery points into TW for backhaul service.

5.  Discuss potential meeting between TW/EPNG/BR

Please give me a call if you would like to discuss the above prior to the meeting or if you would like to add additional topics.  We look
forward to meeting with you Monday, Dec 3rd in our office at 3pm.  Thanks,

Greg Hills
Burlington Resources
Marketing Business Development
(713) 624-9009
Fax: (713) 624-9617
Email:


Prompt:
Glenn, are you taking point on all these new Calif. proceedings?  Given Tony's commitment to other projects right now, I'd like you to, with support from Tony and Dan as needed, if Steve and Rob agree.  When Bill Rapp starts in our group Monday, we can start getting him up to speed as well. Thanks.  DF

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Douglass [mailto:douglass@earthlink.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:34 PM
To: Harris, Steven; Fossum, Drew; Pryor, Tony; Hass, Glen
Subject: Fw: PG&E's Gas Accord II application
Importance: High

Gentlemen,

Attached is PG&E's Gas Accord II application, filed as directed by the
Commission last month in D.01-09-016.  It is captioned as the, "Application
of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U 39 G) Proposing a Market Structure
and Rules for the Northern California Natural Gas Industry for the Period
Beginning January 1, 2003."  The Commission Order required, "an application
proposing a market structure, rates, and terms and conditions of service
relating to the PG&E gas transmission and storage system for the period
beginning January 1, 2003, when most of the provisions of the existing 'Gas
Accord' are scheduled to expire."  There is no testimony attached.  Instead,
PG&E notes that, "the service of supporting testimony at the time an
application is filed is not required by the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure."  They say that testimony, if any, would be filed after a
prehearing conference is scheduled.  The utility suggests December 17 for
the conference.

In summary, PG&E requests Commission authorization to extend the existing,
approved Gas Accord market structure and rates for a two-year period.  Under
this proposal, those provisions of the Gas Accord currently scheduled to
expire as of January 1, 2003, will be extended through December 31, 2004,
while other provisions of Gas Accord scheduled to expire as of April 1, 2003
(consisting of certain storage-related provisions) will be extended through
March 31, 2005.  As noted by the utility, "This approach would not preclude
parties from proposing specific, justified operational or other limited
changes during the two-year extension period.  However, as discussed below,
parties seeking to obtain Commission approval of changes in the Gas Accord
regime, and thus to alter the status quo, must bear the brden of proof on
such issues."  If the simple, two-year extension of the Gas Accord is
adopted as requested, PG&E says it will waive the 2.5 percent escalation for
the two-year Gas Accord II extension period.

The application also notes that on September 20, 2001, shortly after
issuance of D.01-09-016,  PG&E filed a Plan of Reorganization with the
Bankruptcy Court, which, if adopted, would substantially restructure PG&E's
existing business operations.   As proposed, the Plan of Reorganization
would alter the regulation of PG&E's natural gas transmission and storage
system, as the utility's gas transmission and storage operations would be
transferred from PG&E to a new corporation, and operated under exclusive
FERC jurisdiction.   Assuming FERC accepted such jurisdiction, the CPUC
would no longer would have jurisdiction over the rates or terms and
conditions of service on the PG&E gas transmission and storage system.  Your
thoughts on this development would also be appreciated.

I assume we need to review this application to determine its potential
impact on Transwestern and that we should, of course, monitor the proceeding
generally to determine if any active role is required at a later date.  What
are the fundamental issues that concern Transwestern when considering PG&E?
How do you feel about FERC jurisdiction of its transmission/storage systems?

Finally, note that PG&E states that, "...contributing to uncertainty in the
gas markets is the large number of interstate pipeline construction projects
that have been proposed.  It will take at least a year or two before the
viability and impacts of those various pipeline projects can be confirmed in
the marketplace."  The utility also includes a footnote 9 that references
the Transwestern Red Rock FERC application (as well as seven other projects)
as pending at FERC.

Let's discuss at your convenience.

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stewart, John C" <JCSv@pge.com>
To: <alan_reid@pcp.ca>; <andy.bettwy@swgas.com>; <aod@newsdata.com>;
<askaff@energy-law-group.com>; <bcragg@gmssr.com>; <bfinkelstein@turn.org>;
<bjeider@ci.burbank.ca.us>; <blaising@braunlegal.com>; <burkee@cts.com>;
<bwood@energy.state.ca.us>; <ceyap@earthlink.net>; <chilen@llgm.com>;
<chj@a-klaw.com>; <craigc@calpine.com>; <davef@abag.ca.gov>;
<dcarroll@dbsr.com>; <douglas.porter@sce.com>; <dwa3@pge.com>;
<ed@clfp.com>; <edf@cpuc.ca.gov>; <edwardoneill@dwt.com>; <ek@a-klaw.com>;
<eklinkner@ci.pasadena.ca.us>; <epoole@adplaw.com>; <


Prompt:
Glenn, are you taking point on all these new Calif. proceedings?  Given Tony's commitment to other projects right now, I'd like you to, with support from Tony and Dan as needed, if Steve and Rob agree.  When Bill Rapp starts in our group Monday, we can start getting him up to speed as well. Thanks.  DF

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Douglass [mailto:douglass@earthlink.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:34 PM
To: Harris, Steven; Fossum, Drew; Pryor, Tony; Hass, Glen
Subject: Fw: PG&E's Gas Accord II application
Importance: High

Gentlemen,

Attached is PG&E's Gas Accord II application, filed as directed by the
Commission last month in D.01-09-016.  It is captioned as the, "Application
of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U 39 G) Proposing a Market Structure
and Rules for the Northern California Natural Gas Industry for the Period
Beginning January 1, 2003."  The Commission Order required, "an application
proposing a market structure, rates, and terms and conditions of service
relating to the PG&E gas transmission and storage system for the period
beginning January 1, 2003, when most of the provisions of the existing 'Gas
Accord' are scheduled to expire."  There is no testimony attached.  Instead,
PG&E notes that, "the service of supporting testimony at the time an
application is filed is not required by the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure."  They say that testimony, if any, would be filed after a
prehearing conference is scheduled.  The utility suggests December 17 for
the conference.

In summary, PG&E requests Commission authorization to extend the existing,
approved Gas Accord market structure and rates for a two-year period.  Under
this proposal, those provisions of the Gas Accord currently scheduled to
expire as of January 1, 2003, will be extended through December 31, 2004,
while other provisions of Gas Accord scheduled to expire as of April 1, 2003
(consisting of certain storage-related provisions) will be extended through
March 31, 2005.  As noted by the utility, "This approach would not preclude
parties from proposing specific, justified operational or other limited
changes during the two-year extension period.  However, as discussed below,
parties seeking to obtain Commission approval of changes in the Gas Accord
regime, and thus to alter the status quo, must bear the brden of proof on
such issues."  If the simple, two-year extension of the Gas Accord is
adopted as requested, PG&E says it will waive the 2.5 percent escalation for
the two-year Gas Accord II extension period.

The application also notes that on September 20, 2001, shortly after
issuance of D.01-09-016,  PG&E filed a Plan of Reorganization with the
Bankruptcy Court, which, if adopted, would substantially restructure PG&E's
existing business operations.   As proposed, the Plan of Reorganization
would alter the regulation of PG&E's natural gas transmission and storage
system, as the utility's gas transmission and storage operations would be
transferred from PG&E to a new corporation, and operated under exclusive
FERC jurisdiction.   Assuming FERC accepted such jurisdiction, the CPUC
would no longer would have jurisdiction over the rates or terms and
conditions of service on the PG&E gas transmission and storage system.  Your
thoughts on this development would also be appreciated.

I assume we need to review this application to determine its potential
impact on Transwestern and that we should, of course, monitor the proceeding
generally to determine if any active role is required at a later date.  What
are the fundamental issues that concern Transwestern when considering PG&E?
How do you feel about FERC jurisdiction of its transmission/storage systems?

Finally, note that PG&E states that, "...contributing to uncertainty in the
gas markets is the large number of interstate pipeline construction projects
that have been proposed.  It will take at least a year or two before the
viability and impacts of those various pipeline projects can be confirmed in
the marketplace."  The utility also includes a footnote 9 that references
the Transwestern Red Rock FERC application (as well as seven other projects)
as pending at FERC.

Let's discuss at your convenience.

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stewart, John C" <JCSv@pge.com>
To: <alan_reid@pcp.ca>; <andy.bettwy@swgas.com>; <aod@newsdata.com>;
<askaff@energy-law-group.com>; <bcragg@gmssr.com>; <bfinkelstein@turn.org>;
<bjeider@ci.burbank.ca.us>; <blaising@braunlegal.com>; <burkee@cts.com>;
<bwood@energy.state.ca.us>; <ceyap@earthlink.net>; <chilen@llgm.com>;
<chj@a-klaw.com>; <craigc@calpine.com>; <davef@abag.ca.gov>;
<dcarroll@dbsr.com>; <douglas.porter@sce.com>; <dwa3@pge.com>;
<ed@clfp.com>; <edf@cpuc.ca.gov>; <edwardoneill@dwt.com>; <ek@a-klaw.com>;
<eklinkner@ci.pasadena.ca.us>; <epoole@adplaw.com>; <eyq@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<fdeleon@energy.state.ca.us>; <furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil>;
<ghinners@reliantenergy.com>; <


Prompt:
Glenn, are you taking point on all these new Calif. proceedings?  Given Tony's commitment to other projects right now, I'd like you to, with support from Tony and Dan as needed, if Steve and Rob agree.  When Bill Rapp starts in our group Monday, we can start getting him up to speed as well. Thanks.  DF

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Douglass [mailto:douglass@earthlink.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:34 PM
To: Harris, Steven; Fossum, Drew; Pryor, Tony; Hass, Glen
Subject: Fw: PG&E's Gas Accord II application
Importance: High

Gentlemen,

Attached is PG&E's Gas Accord II application, filed as directed by the
Commission last month in D.01-09-016.  It is captioned as the, "Application
of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U 39 G) Proposing a Market Structure
and Rules for the Northern California Natural Gas Industry for the Period
Beginning January 1, 2003."  The Commission Order required, "an application
proposing a market structure, rates, and terms and conditions of service
relating to the PG&E gas transmission and storage system for the period
beginning January 1, 2003, when most of the provisions of the existing 'Gas
Accord' are scheduled to expire."  There is no testimony attached.  Instead,
PG&E notes that, "the service of supporting testimony at the time an
application is filed is not required by the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure."  They say that testimony, if any, would be filed after a
prehearing conference is scheduled.  The utility suggests December 17 for
the conference.

In summary, PG&E requests Commission authorization to extend the existing,
approved Gas Accord market structure and rates for a two-year period.  Under
this proposal, those provisions of the Gas Accord currently scheduled to
expire as of January 1, 2003, will be extended through December 31, 2004,
while other provisions of Gas Accord scheduled to expire as of April 1, 2003
(consisting of certain storage-related provisions) will be extended through
March 31, 2005.  As noted by the utility, "This approach would not preclude
parties from proposing specific, justified operational or other limited
changes during the two-year extension period.  However, as discussed below,
parties seeking to obtain Commission approval of changes in the Gas Accord
regime, and thus to alter the status quo, must bear the brden of proof on
such issues."  If the simple, two-year extension of the Gas Accord is
adopted as requested, PG&E says it will waive the 2.5 percent escalation for
the two-year Gas Accord II extension period.

The application also notes that on September 20, 2001, shortly after
issuance of D.01-09-016,  PG&E filed a Plan of Reorganization with the
Bankruptcy Court, which, if adopted, would substantially restructure PG&E's
existing business operations.   As proposed, the Plan of Reorganization
would alter the regulation of PG&E's natural gas transmission and storage
system, as the utility's gas transmission and storage operations would be
transferred from PG&E to a new corporation, and operated under exclusive
FERC jurisdiction.   Assuming FERC accepted such jurisdiction, the CPUC
would no longer would have jurisdiction over the rates or terms and
conditions of service on the PG&E gas transmission and storage system.  Your
thoughts on this development would also be appreciated.

I assume we need to review this application to determine its potential
impact on Transwestern and that we should, of course, monitor the proceeding
generally to determine if any active role is required at a later date.  What
are the fundamental issues that concern Transwestern when considering PG&E?
How do you feel about FERC jurisdiction of its transmission/storage systems?

Finally, note that PG&E states that, "...contributing to uncertainty in the
gas markets is the large number of interstate pipeline construction projects
that have been proposed.  It will take at least a year or two before the
viability and impacts of those various pipeline projects can be confirmed in
the marketplace."  The utility also includes a footnote 9 that references
the Transwestern Red Rock FERC application (as well as seven other projects)
as pending at FERC.

Let's discuss at your convenience.

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stewart, John C" <JCSv@pge.com>
To: <alan_reid@pcp.ca>; <andy.bettwy@swgas.com>; <aod@newsdata.com>;
<askaff@energy-law-group.com>; <bcragg@gmssr.com>; <bfinkelstein@turn.org>;
<bjeider@ci.burbank.ca.us>; <blaising@braunlegal.com>; <burkee@cts.com>;
<bwood@energy.state.ca.us>; <ceyap@earthlink.net>; <chilen@llgm.com>;
<chj@a-klaw.com>; <craigc@calpine.com>; <davef@abag.ca.gov>;
<dcarroll@dbsr.com>; <douglas.porter@sce.com>; <dwa3@pge.com>;
<ed@clfp.com>; <edf@cpuc.ca.gov>; <edwardoneill@dwt.com>; <ek@a-klaw.com>;
<eklinkner@ci.pasadena.ca.us>; <epoole@adplaw.com>; <eyq@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<fdeleon@energy.state.ca.us>; <furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil>;
<ghinners@reliantenergy.com>; <grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us>;
<gsullivan@sempra.com>; <gtbl@dynegy.com>; <gtbl@dynegy.com>;
<haorndorff@aeraenergy.com>; <iep@iepa.com>; <igsinc@ix.netcom.com>;
<inggm@sce.com>; <jcattermole@pcenergy.com>; <jkarp@whitecase.com>;
<jkarp@whitecase.com>; <jleslie@luce.com>; <jmct@gmssr.com>;
<joe.paul@dynegy.com>; <johnj@bcjlaw.com>; <johnwalley@swgas.com>;
<joseh@lif.org>; <jpbatmale@realenergy.com>; <jsteffen@iid.com>;
<jsw@cpuc.ca.gov>; <jweil@aglet.org>; <jwr@cpuc.ca.gov>; <karen@klindh.com>;
<kbhensman@aeraenergy.com>; <kfyip@seiworldwide.com>; <kmccrea@sablaw.com>;
<kmills@cfbf.com>; <lifcentral@lif.org>; <lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com>;
<lmh@eslawfirm.com>; <mark.c.moench@wgp.twc.com>; <mcn@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<mday@gmssr.com>; <mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com>; <mer@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<mjaske@energy.state.ca.us>; <napedersen@jonesday.com>;
<pjpowerlaw@aol.com>; <plg@cpuc.ca.gov>; <ram@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<raveen_maan@city.palo-alto.ca.us>; <raw@cpuc.ca.gov>; <rax@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>; <rczahar@aol.com>; <rfoss@coral-energy.com>;
"'rgloistein@orrick.com'" <rgloistein@Orrick.com>;
<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>; <rmp@cpuc.ca.gov>; <rochmanm@cubjpa.org>;
<roger.pelote@williams.com>; <ron_oechsler@rmiinc.com>; <ronknecht@aol.com>;
<rpetti@ladwp.com>; <salleyoo@dwt.com>; <sbs@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<skatz@sempratrading.com>; <slins@ci.glendale.ca.us>; <sscott3@enron.com>;
<stomashe@energy.state.ca.us>; <


Prompt:
Glenn, are you taking point on all these new Calif. proceedings?  Given Tony's commitment to other projects right now, I'd like you to, with support from Tony and Dan as needed, if Steve and Rob agree.  When Bill Rapp starts in our group Monday, we can start getting him up to speed as well. Thanks.  DF

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Douglass [mailto:douglass@earthlink.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:34 PM
To: Harris, Steven; Fossum, Drew; Pryor, Tony; Hass, Glen
Subject: Fw: PG&E's Gas Accord II application
Importance: High

Gentlemen,

Attached is PG&E's Gas Accord II application, filed as directed by the
Commission last month in D.01-09-016.  It is captioned as the, "Application
of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U 39 G) Proposing a Market Structure
and Rules for the Northern California Natural Gas Industry for the Period
Beginning January 1, 2003."  The Commission Order required, "an application
proposing a market structure, rates, and terms and conditions of service
relating to the PG&E gas transmission and storage system for the period
beginning January 1, 2003, when most of the provisions of the existing 'Gas
Accord' are scheduled to expire."  There is no testimony attached.  Instead,
PG&E notes that, "the service of supporting testimony at the time an
application is filed is not required by the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure."  They say that testimony, if any, would be filed after a
prehearing conference is scheduled.  The utility suggests December 17 for
the conference.

In summary, PG&E requests Commission authorization to extend the existing,
approved Gas Accord market structure and rates for a two-year period.  Under
this proposal, those provisions of the Gas Accord currently scheduled to
expire as of January 1, 2003, will be extended through December 31, 2004,
while other provisions of Gas Accord scheduled to expire as of April 1, 2003
(consisting of certain storage-related provisions) will be extended through
March 31, 2005.  As noted by the utility, "This approach would not preclude
parties from proposing specific, justified operational or other limited
changes during the two-year extension period.  However, as discussed below,
parties seeking to obtain Commission approval of changes in the Gas Accord
regime, and thus to alter the status quo, must bear the brden of proof on
such issues."  If the simple, two-year extension of the Gas Accord is
adopted as requested, PG&E says it will waive the 2.5 percent escalation for
the two-year Gas Accord II extension period.

The application also notes that on September 20, 2001, shortly after
issuance of D.01-09-016,  PG&E filed a Plan of Reorganization with the
Bankruptcy Court, which, if adopted, would substantially restructure PG&E's
existing business operations.   As proposed, the Plan of Reorganization
would alter the regulation of PG&E's natural gas transmission and storage
system, as the utility's gas transmission and storage operations would be
transferred from PG&E to a new corporation, and operated under exclusive
FERC jurisdiction.   Assuming FERC accepted such jurisdiction, the CPUC
would no longer would have jurisdiction over the rates or terms and
conditions of service on the PG&E gas transmission and storage system.  Your
thoughts on this development would also be appreciated.

I assume we need to review this application to determine its potential
impact on Transwestern and that we should, of course, monitor the proceeding
generally to determine if any active role is required at a later date.  What
are the fundamental issues that concern Transwestern when considering PG&E?
How do you feel about FERC jurisdiction of its transmission/storage systems?

Finally, note that PG&E states that, "...contributing to uncertainty in the
gas markets is the large number of interstate pipeline construction projects
that have been proposed.  It will take at least a year or two before the
viability and impacts of those various pipeline projects can be confirmed in
the marketplace."  The utility also includes a footnote 9 that references
the Transwestern Red Rock FERC application (as well as seven other projects)
as pending at FERC.

Let's discuss at your convenience.

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stewart, John C" <JCSv@pge.com>
To: <alan_reid@pcp.ca>; <andy.bettwy@swgas.com>; <aod@newsdata.com>;
<askaff@energy-law-group.com>; <bcragg@gmssr.com>; <bfinkelstein@turn.org>;
<bjeider@ci.burbank.ca.us>; <blaising@braunlegal.com>; <burkee@cts.com>;
<bwood@energy.state.ca.us>; <ceyap@earthlink.net>; <chilen@llgm.com>;
<chj@a-klaw.com>; <craigc@calpine.com>; <davef@abag.ca.gov>;
<dcarroll@dbsr.com>; <douglas.porter@sce.com>; <dwa3@pge.com>;
<ed@clfp.com>; <edf@cpuc.ca.gov>; <edwardoneill@dwt.com>; <ek@a-klaw.com>;
<eklinkner@ci.pasadena.ca.us>; <epoole@adplaw.com>; <eyq@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<fdeleon@energy.state.ca.us>; <furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil>;
<ghinners@reliantenergy.com>; <grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us>;
<gsullivan@sempra.com>; <gtbl@dynegy.com>; <gtbl@dynegy.com>;
<haorndorff@aeraenergy.com>; <iep@iepa.com>; <igsinc@ix.netcom.com>;
<inggm@sce.com>; <jcattermole@pcenergy.com>; <jkarp@whitecase.com>;
<jkarp@whitecase.com>; <jleslie@luce.com>; <jmct@gmssr.com>;
<joe.paul@dynegy.com>; <johnj@bcjlaw.com>; <johnwalley@swgas.com>;
<joseh@lif.org>; <jpbatmale@realenergy.com>; <jsteffen@iid.com>;
<jsw@cpuc.ca.gov>; <jweil@aglet.org>; <jwr@cpuc.ca.gov>; <karen@klindh.com>;
<kbhensman@aeraenergy.com>; <kfyip@seiworldwide.com>; <kmccrea@sablaw.com>;
<kmills@cfbf.com>; <lifcentral@lif.org>; <lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com>;
<lmh@eslawfirm.com>; <mark.c.moench@wgp.twc.com>; <mcn@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<mday@gmssr.com>; <mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com>; <mer@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<mjaske@energy.state.ca.us>; <napedersen@jonesday.com>;
<pjpowerlaw@aol.com>; <plg@cpuc.ca.gov>; <ram@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<raveen_maan@city.palo-alto.ca.us>; <raw@cpuc.ca.gov>; <rax@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>; <rczahar@aol.com>; <rfoss@coral-energy.com>;
"'rgloistein@orrick.com'" <rgloistein@Orrick.com>;
<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>; <rmp@cpuc.ca.gov>; <rochmanm@cubjpa.org>;
<roger.pelote@williams.com>; <ron_oechsler@rmiinc.com>; <ronknecht@aol.com>;
<rpetti@ladwp.com>; <salleyoo@dwt.com>; <sbs@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<skatz@sempratrading.com>; <slins@ci.glendale.ca.us>; <sscott3@enron.com>;
<stomashe@energy.state.ca.us>; <tah@cpuc.ca.gov>; <tdickers@westerngas.com>;
<thompson@wrightlaw.com>; <tom.roth@et.pge.com>;
<tomb@crossborderenergy.com>; <trdill@westernhubs.com>; <


Prompt:
Glenn, are you taking point on all these new Calif. proceedings?  Given Tony's commitment to other projects right now, I'd like you to, with support from Tony and Dan as needed, if Steve and Rob agree.  When Bill Rapp starts in our group Monday, we can start getting him up to speed as well. Thanks.  DF

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Douglass [mailto:douglass@earthlink.net]
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2001 1:34 PM
To: Harris, Steven; Fossum, Drew; Pryor, Tony; Hass, Glen
Subject: Fw: PG&E's Gas Accord II application
Importance: High

Gentlemen,

Attached is PG&E's Gas Accord II application, filed as directed by the
Commission last month in D.01-09-016.  It is captioned as the, "Application
of Pacific Gas and Electric Company (U 39 G) Proposing a Market Structure
and Rules for the Northern California Natural Gas Industry for the Period
Beginning January 1, 2003."  The Commission Order required, "an application
proposing a market structure, rates, and terms and conditions of service
relating to the PG&E gas transmission and storage system for the period
beginning January 1, 2003, when most of the provisions of the existing 'Gas
Accord' are scheduled to expire."  There is no testimony attached.  Instead,
PG&E notes that, "the service of supporting testimony at the time an
application is filed is not required by the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure."  They say that testimony, if any, would be filed after a
prehearing conference is scheduled.  The utility suggests December 17 for
the conference.

In summary, PG&E requests Commission authorization to extend the existing,
approved Gas Accord market structure and rates for a two-year period.  Under
this proposal, those provisions of the Gas Accord currently scheduled to
expire as of January 1, 2003, will be extended through December 31, 2004,
while other provisions of Gas Accord scheduled to expire as of April 1, 2003
(consisting of certain storage-related provisions) will be extended through
March 31, 2005.  As noted by the utility, "This approach would not preclude
parties from proposing specific, justified operational or other limited
changes during the two-year extension period.  However, as discussed below,
parties seeking to obtain Commission approval of changes in the Gas Accord
regime, and thus to alter the status quo, must bear the brden of proof on
such issues."  If the simple, two-year extension of the Gas Accord is
adopted as requested, PG&E says it will waive the 2.5 percent escalation for
the two-year Gas Accord II extension period.

The application also notes that on September 20, 2001, shortly after
issuance of D.01-09-016,  PG&E filed a Plan of Reorganization with the
Bankruptcy Court, which, if adopted, would substantially restructure PG&E's
existing business operations.   As proposed, the Plan of Reorganization
would alter the regulation of PG&E's natural gas transmission and storage
system, as the utility's gas transmission and storage operations would be
transferred from PG&E to a new corporation, and operated under exclusive
FERC jurisdiction.   Assuming FERC accepted such jurisdiction, the CPUC
would no longer would have jurisdiction over the rates or terms and
conditions of service on the PG&E gas transmission and storage system.  Your
thoughts on this development would also be appreciated.

I assume we need to review this application to determine its potential
impact on Transwestern and that we should, of course, monitor the proceeding
generally to determine if any active role is required at a later date.  What
are the fundamental issues that concern Transwestern when considering PG&E?
How do you feel about FERC jurisdiction of its transmission/storage systems?

Finally, note that PG&E states that, "...contributing to uncertainty in the
gas markets is the large number of interstate pipeline construction projects
that have been proposed.  It will take at least a year or two before the
viability and impacts of those various pipeline projects can be confirmed in
the marketplace."  The utility also includes a footnote 9 that references
the Transwestern Red Rock FERC application (as well as seven other projects)
as pending at FERC.

Let's discuss at your convenience.

Dan

Law Offices of Daniel W. Douglass
5959 Topanga Canyon Blvd.  Suite 244
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Tel:   (818) 596-2201
Fax:  (818) 346-6502
douglass@energyattorney.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stewart, John C" <JCSv@pge.com>
To: <alan_reid@pcp.ca>; <andy.bettwy@swgas.com>; <aod@newsdata.com>;
<askaff@energy-law-group.com>; <bcragg@gmssr.com>; <bfinkelstein@turn.org>;
<bjeider@ci.burbank.ca.us>; <blaising@braunlegal.com>; <burkee@cts.com>;
<bwood@energy.state.ca.us>; <ceyap@earthlink.net>; <chilen@llgm.com>;
<chj@a-klaw.com>; <craigc@calpine.com>; <davef@abag.ca.gov>;
<dcarroll@dbsr.com>; <douglas.porter@sce.com>; <dwa3@pge.com>;
<ed@clfp.com>; <edf@cpuc.ca.gov>; <edwardoneill@dwt.com>; <ek@a-klaw.com>;
<eklinkner@ci.pasadena.ca.us>; <epoole@adplaw.com>; <eyq@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<fdeleon@energy.state.ca.us>; <furutanj@efawest.navfac.navy.mil>;
<ghinners@reliantenergy.com>; <grant_kolling@city.palo-alto.ca.us>;
<gsullivan@sempra.com>; <gtbl@dynegy.com>; <gtbl@dynegy.com>;
<haorndorff@aeraenergy.com>; <iep@iepa.com>; <igsinc@ix.netcom.com>;
<inggm@sce.com>; <jcattermole@pcenergy.com>; <jkarp@whitecase.com>;
<jkarp@whitecase.com>; <jleslie@luce.com>; <jmct@gmssr.com>;
<joe.paul@dynegy.com>; <johnj@bcjlaw.com>; <johnwalley@swgas.com>;
<joseh@lif.org>; <jpbatmale@realenergy.com>; <jsteffen@iid.com>;
<jsw@cpuc.ca.gov>; <jweil@aglet.org>; <jwr@cpuc.ca.gov>; <karen@klindh.com>;
<kbhensman@aeraenergy.com>; <kfyip@seiworldwide.com>; <kmccrea@sablaw.com>;
<kmills@cfbf.com>; <lifcentral@lif.org>; <lindseyhowdowning@dwt.com>;
<lmh@eslawfirm.com>; <mark.c.moench@wgp.twc.com>; <mcn@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<mday@gmssr.com>; <mdjoseph@adamsbroadwell.com>; <mer@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<mjaske@energy.state.ca.us>; <napedersen@jonesday.com>;
<pjpowerlaw@aol.com>; <plg@cpuc.ca.gov>; <ram@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<raveen_maan@city.palo-alto.ca.us>; <raw@cpuc.ca.gov>; <rax@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<rbw@mrwassoc.com>; <rczahar@aol.com>; <rfoss@coral-energy.com>;
"'rgloistein@orrick.com'" <rgloistein@Orrick.com>;
<rick.counihan@greenmountain.com>; <rmp@cpuc.ca.gov>; <rochmanm@cubjpa.org>;
<roger.pelote@williams.com>; <ron_oechsler@rmiinc.com>; <ronknecht@aol.com>;
<rpetti@ladwp.com>; <salleyoo@dwt.com>; <sbs@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<skatz@sempratrading.com>; <slins@ci.glendale.ca.us>; <sscott3@enron.com>;
<stomashe@energy.state.ca.us>; <tah@cpuc.ca.gov>; <tdickers@westerngas.com>;
<thompson@wrightlaw.com>; <tom.roth@et.pge.com>;
<tomb@crossborderenergy.com>; <trdill@westernhubs.com>; <vjb@cpuc.ca.gov>;
<cabaker@duke-energy.com>; <mtbrommer@tid.org>; <keith.brown@swgas.com>;
<bbrunel@smud.org>; <pcervin@br-inc.com>; <scohn@smud.org>;
<bruce.a.connell@usa.conoco.com>; <jdasovic@enron.com>;
<eric.eisenman@neg.pge.com>; <


Prompt:
Caminus Training in December 2001

You are invited to attend 2 training programs that will take place in the
New York office next month.  The cost for each program is $960 per day.
Space is limited so please sign up quickly by sending an email to


Prompt:
Please See Attachments.

~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~~*~
Tonya Carpenter
Burlington Resources
Gas Marketing
(713) 624-9170
E-mail:


Prompt:
Surprise! You've just received a Yahoo! Greeting
from "Mike" (


Prompt:
---------------------- Forwarded by Jane M Tholt/HOU/ECT on 07/18/2000 03:15
PM ---------------------------

"Pete Cervin" <pcervin@br-inc.com> on 07/18/2000 01:09:51 PM
Please respond to <pcervin@br-inc.com>
To: <jane.m.tholt@enron.com>
cc:
Subject: fwd: FW: Pooling Technical Subcommittee Meeting

See attached.
---------- Original Text ----------

From: "Royal, Kathleen S." <RoyalK@EPEnergy.com>, on 7/18/00 12:17 PM:
To: ISMTP@FTW9@Servers["'bcantre@enron.com'"
<bcantre@enron.com>],ISMTP@FTW9@Servers["'