--- license: cc-by-nc-4.0 library_name: pytorch tags: - chemistry - cheminformatics - optical-chemical-structure-recognition - ocsr - molecule-recognition - smiles - transformer - swin-transformer - minimum-risk-training - molecular-graph datasets: - Keylab/COMO metrics: - exact_match - tanimoto_similarity --- # COMO: Closed-Loop Optical Molecule Recognition COMO (Closed-loop Optical Molecule recOgnition) is a deep learning framework for Optical Chemical Structure Recognition (OCSR). It recognizes chemical structure diagrams from images and predicts SMILES strings with atom-level 2D coordinates and bond matrices. COMO uses Minimum Risk Training (MRT) to directly optimize molecular-level, non-differentiable objectives, closing the gap between token-level training and molecular-level evaluation. ## Model Summary - **Architecture:** Swin-B encoder → 6-layer Transformer decoder → bond MLP - **Input:** 384×384 RGB image of a chemical structure diagram - **Output:** SMILES string + atom coordinates + bond matrix - **Vocabulary:** chartok_coords format (200 tokens: SMILES chars + 64 X/Y bins) - **Parameters:** ~94M - **Training data:** 1M PubChem + 652K USPTO (MLE) + 83K MolParser-SFT (MRT) ## Available Checkpoints All checkpoints are from the **joint MLE+MRT** training pipeline (30 epochs, interleaved MLE/MRT from scratch). Three reward variants are provided: | Checkpoint | Reward Mode | Description | |-----------|-------------|-------------| | `models/tanimoto/final.pth` | Tanimoto | Morgan fingerprint Tanimoto similarity reward | | `models/tanimoto/best.pth` | Tanimoto | Best validation epoch | | `models/edit_distance/final.pth` | Edit Distance | Levenshtein string-similarity reward | | `models/edit_distance/best.pth` | Edit Distance | Best validation epoch | | `models/visual/final.pth` | Visual | Siamese visual-encoder cosine-similarity reward | | `models/visual/best.pth` | Visual | Best validation epoch | ## Architecture ``` Image (384×384) → Swin-B backbone (ImageNet pretrained) → 2D sinusoidal positional encoding → 6-layer Transformer decoder (d=256, 8 heads) → chartok_coords tokens → SMILES + coordinates → Bond MLP (2-layer, GELU) → 7-class bond matrix → Graph reconstruction → canonical SMILES ``` The model outputs a molecular graph $G = (A, B)$ where: - $A = \{(l_i, x_i, y_i)\}$ — atom SMILES labels with 2D image coordinates - $B$ — pairwise bond types (none, single, double, triple, aromatic, wedge, dash) ## Training ### MLE Phase - **Data:** 1M PubChem SMILES (synthetic) + 652K USPTO patent molecules - **Augmentation:** Indigo-rendered images with random styles, functional group substitution, R-group insertion, wavy bonds, scan shadows, multilingual comments - **Optimizer:** AdamW, lr=4×10⁻⁴ (encoder & decoder), weight decay=10⁻⁶ - **Schedule:** 2% linear warmup → cosine decay, batch size 64/GPU - **Loss:** Label-smoothed cross-entropy (ε=0.1) + bond classification CE ### MRT Phase - **Data:** 83K real-world molecular images (MolParser-SFT) - **Candidates:** N=32 per image, multinomial sampling at τ=0.5 - **Reward weights:** validity=0.1, similarity=0.5, exact match=0.4 - **Sharpening:** α=1.0, loss weight λ=0.1 - **Schedule:** First 5 epochs MLE-only warmup, then interleaved MLE+MRT ## Evaluation Results Exact match accuracy (%) on 10 benchmarks (COMO-Tanimoto variant): | Benchmark | Images | Synthetic/Real | COMO-Tanimoto | |-----------|--------|----------------|---------------| | Indigo | 5,719 | Synthetic | 98.6 | | ChemDraw | 5,719 | Synthetic | 96.5 | | CLEF | 992 | Real (patents) | 94.8 | | JPO | 450 | Real (patents) | 88.4 | | UOB | 5,740 | Real (academic) | 98.0* | | USPTO | 5,719 | Real (patents) | 93.4 | | USPTO-10K | 10,000 | Real (patents) | 96.1 | | Staker | 50,000 | Real | 87.4 | | ACS | 331 | Real (publications) | 84.6 | | WildMol-10K | 10,000 | Real (wild) | 77.1 | *\*UOB results after tautomer standardization.* See the [paper](#citation) for full comparison with MolScribe, MolParser, SwinOCSR, and other baselines. ## Installation ```bash pip install como-ocsr ``` ## Usage ```python import como # Download checkpoint from HuggingFace: # huggingface-cli download Keylab/COMO models/tanimoto/final.pth model = como.load_model("models/tanimoto/final.pth", device="cuda") # Single image prediction smiles = como.predict(model, "molecule.png") print(smiles) # "CC(=O)O" # Batch prediction smiles_list = como.predict_batch(model, ["mol1.png", "mol2.png"]) # Benchmark evaluation metrics = como.evaluate(model, "benchmark/USPTO/", "benchmark/USPTO.csv") print(f"Exact Match: {metrics['postprocess/exact_match_acc']:.2%}") ``` Full documentation: [Github](https://github.com/netknowledge/COMO) [PyPI](https://pypi.org/project/como-ocsr/) ## Benchmarks Benchmark datasets are available in the `benchmarks/` directory of this repository. Each dataset contains `.png` images and a CSV file with columns `image_id` and `SMILES`. **Note:** These benchmarks are collected from existing public OCSR datasets. Please refer to the original sources for attribution: | Dataset | Source | |---------|--------| | USPTO, CLEF, JPO, UOB, Staker | [Rajan et al., 2020](https://github.com/Kohulan/OCSR_Review), [Xiong et al., 2023](https://github.com/jiachengxiong/alpha-Extractor) | | Indigo, ChemDraw, ACS, Staker | [Qian et al., 2023](https://github.com/thomas0809/MolScribe) | | USPTO-10K | [Morin et al., 2023](https://huggingface.co/datasets/docling-project/USPTO-30K) | | WildMol-10K | [Fang et al., 2025](https://github.com/orgs/Chem-Struct-ML/repositories) | ## License - **Model Weights:** CC BY-NC 4.0 (non-commercial use only) - **Code:** MIT License - **Benchmarks:** See original sources for applicable terms ## Citation ```bibtex @article{lyu2026closed, title={COMO: Closed-Loop Optical Molecule Recognition with Minimum Risk Training}, author={Lyu, Zhuoqi and Ke, Qing}, journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.23546}, year={2026} } ```